PO Box 531  •  Durham,NC 27702  •  Telephone: (919) 419-8311  •  Fax: (919) 419-8315

Monday, May 12, 2008

Report finds progress for some, hardships for many since Katrina

The recovery of Louisiana's people from Hurricane Katrina is far from complete.

That's the conclusion of a report released today by the Louisiana Family Recovery Corps, a Baton Rouge-based nonprofit that helps families and individuals recover from storm-related losses. Titled "Progress for Some, Hope and Hardships for Many," the report examines the obstacles still faced by many Louisiana residents and highlights what officials can do to help.

"Just like our state's levees, roads and homes, the lives of our people still need our attention and resource commitments," says Recovery Corps CEO Raymond Jetson. "Some residents are on the road to recovery and some are facing roadblocks."

The report was based on a survey of more than 2,100 storm-impacted residents in Calcasieu, Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines and St. Bernard parishes. About 45 percent of the households surveyed were black while about 51 percent were white. About 60 percent of the households surveyed were made up of adults without children, 20 percent were single adults with children, and 17 percent were married couples with children.

Among the report's key findings:

* Only one-third of impacted residents consider themselves mostly recovered from the disaster.

* Residents of Orleans Parish report the greatest challenges and slowest progress toward recovery.

* Black households report much greater impacts than white households. For example, nearly half of black households live someplace different than before the disaster, compared to only 20 percent of white households. This holds true even for black households with higher incomes.

* Only 20 percent of residents feel there are adequate resources to aid in recovery.

The report offers a number of broad policy suggestions that include confronting the emerging disparity in access and interest in training and employment opportunities, homeownership and stress management; initiating interventions that are "culturally competent and relevant"; and creating services to provide one-time financial help to impacted residents.

As the report concludes:
The human voice in recovery has been often overpowered by the sound of progress in rebuilding buildings, repairing levees, or even the silence of barren neighborhoods once full of life. The collective future of Louisiana is tied to the way in which we continue to approach recovery, particularly human recovery. The voices of people, our people, are shouting loudly to all that can hear. Are you listening?

Labels: , , ,

posted by Sue Sturgis at 2:41 PM | Email this post

Saturday, April 19, 2008

LA, NC join states giving breaks to low-income taxpayers

Amidst the Tax Day groans across the South and country this week, there was one piece of good news for low-income taxpayers: this year, four states -- including Louisiana and North Carolina -- started giving an Earned Income Tax Credit.

As Stateline.org reports:
Washington state, New Mexico, North Carolina and Louisiana this year joined 20 other states in offering so-called Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) programs — an initiative patterned after a successful federal tax credit program for the poor launched in the mid-1970s that gives federal taxes back to low-income taxpayers.
On the downside, Louisiana and North Carolina -- the only two Southern states to offer the EITC, aside from Virginia -- offer the least relief in the nation:
State EITC rates vary widely, ranging from a low of 3.5 percent of the federal credit in North Carolina and Louisiana to a high of 35 percent in the District of Columbia, 32 percent in Vermont, 30 percent in New York and 25 percent in Maryland and Rhode Island.
Experts also note that the addition of Washington state -- which doesn't have an income tax -- could open the door for states like Florida, Tennessee and Texas, which also don't have an income tax.

Labels: , , ,

posted by Chris Kromm at 11:09 PM | Email this post

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

Seeking justice for the Angola Three

For more than three decades, Herman Wallace and Albert Woodfox have been locked in solitary confinement in Louisiana's notorious Angola prison for a murder the evidence shows they did not commit. Along with Robert King Wilkerson, who has since been exonerated, the men were charged with murdering a prison guard and convicted by all-white juries -- even though the bloody fingerprints found at the crime scene did not match their own.

The charges against the three men, who were initially imprisoned for unrelated robberies, came in the wake of protests they organized to fight corruption and abuse in the prison system. Wallace and Woodfox have alibi witnesses, while those who testified against them say they were coerced by prison officials. Even the murdered guard's widow doesn't believe the men are guilty and has called on state and federal officials to find the real killer.

ColorofChange.org, an e-activist group that played a key role in pressing for justice for Louisiana's Jena 6, has now taken up the cause of the Angola 3. The group is asking for the public's help in calling on the Department of Justice and Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal to investigate. To read more about their take on the case and to add your voice their call for justice, click here. You can also learn more at www.angola3.org.

Labels: , , ,

posted by Sue Sturgis at 5:13 PM | Email this post

Friday, March 14, 2008

"Like pigs in a cage": Katrina guest workers fight 21st century slavery in Mississippi

More than 100 guest workers carrying signs that said "I Am a Man" and "Dignity" walked off the job at a Mississippi shipyard last week to protest conditions they liken to slavery.

The shipyard workers, who are from India, have filed a class-action lawsuit [PDF] against Pascagoula, Miss.-based Signal International, one of the largest marine and fabrication companies in the Gulf of Mexico. The suit also targets recruiters in the U.S., India and United Arab Emirates, as well as New Orleans immigration attorney Malvern Burnett and the Gulf Coast Immigration Law Center.

Filed in federal court in the Eastern District of Louisiana, where many of the defendants are based, the suit says that in the wake of Hurricane Katrina more than 500 Indian men were trafficked into the United States through the federal H2B guest worker program to work for Signal at shipyards in Pascagoula and Orange, Texas. Lured by promises of permanent work and a chance at legal immigration, the men gave up their jobs in India and went into debt to finance fees as high as $20,000 each. They then allegedly had their passports and visas held by recruiters who told them that changing their minds about working for Signal could bring legal action and even physical harm.

Once in the United States, the men were forced to live in guarded, overcrowded and isolated labor camps, the suit charges. After several of the plaintiffs spoke out against conditions in the Pascagoula camp, Signal security guards allegedly tried to forcibly deport them. One of the workers -- Sabulal Vijayan -- became so distraught by the threat of deportation that he attempted suicide and had to be hospitalized. The guards locked three of the other men in a room for several hours, refusing to provide them with water or bathroom access. The abuse left Signal's immigrant workers terrorized, the suit says:
Deeply fearful, isolated, disoriented, and unfamiliar with their rights under United States law, these workers felt compelled to continue working for Signal.
Filed by the Louisiana Justice Institute, Southern Poverty Law Center and the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, the suit charges the defendants with violating the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, the Civil Rights Act of 1866, and the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, among other laws. Five of the plaintiffs are also bringing individual claims of false imprisonment, assault, battery, and infliction of emotional distress. The workers are also asking the Department of Justice to investigate. Signal says the charges are untrue and that most of its guest workers are satisfied with their living conditions.

During last Thursday's walkout, the workers threw their hardhats over the fence in protest as they left the shipyard and sang "We Shall Overcome." Saket Soni of the New Orleans Workers' Center for Racial Justice, who served as an interpreter, said the workers talked of living "like pigs in a cage."

"The U.S. State Department calls it 'a repulsive crime' when recruiters and employers in other parts of the world bind guest workers with crushing debts and threats of deportation," Soni says. "This is precisely what is happening on the Gulf Coast."

(Photo by Ted Quant courtesy of neworleans.indymedia.org. To see more images from the protest, click on the previous link or the photo above.)

Labels: , , , , , ,

posted by Sue Sturgis at 5:23 PM | Email this post

Thursday, March 13, 2008

Survey to assess health impacts of Katrina and Rita

People whose health was directly affected by hurricanes Katrina and Rita -- whether as evacuees, displaced persons, rescue and recovery workers, or volunteers -- are invited to participate in a groundbreaking national survey that will assess the storms' impact on mental and physical well-being. The survey's sponsors, the Louisiana Environmental Action Network and Partners Publishing, explain their aims:
The primary purpose of the survey is to identify the current health status of individuals whose physical and psychological health remains negatively impacted from exposures to flood waters, hurricane sediment, water-damaged buildings, mold, formaldehyde and/or mold in FEMA-provided trailers, mobile homes, or park models, and/or other contaminants incurred during and/or after Hurricane Katrina, Hurricane Rita, and/or from other contaminant-laden post-hurricane housing. The secondary purpose of the survey is to identify the total number of people who have become physically and/or psychologically ill since hurricanes Katrina and Rita to assist in identifying health trends, patterns of illnesses, and geographic clusters of increased levels of illnesses.
The The 2008 Nationwide Katrina and Rita Health Survey will be available online during an eight-week period that began yesterday and ends May 7. Results will be compiled by town, parish and state. Information on preliminary data will be released midway through the survey period, with a full report set for its conclusion. A Spanish version of the survey will be available by March 24, organizers say.

Labels: , , , , ,

posted by Sue Sturgis at 5:49 PM | Email this post

Blanco gave controversial Road Home contractor a secret raise

While former Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Blanco is making the most of her time out of office delivering speeches and writing a book, there's more trouble brewing for her back in the capital. From today's New Orleans Times-Picayune:
In the final weeks of Gov. Kathleen Blanco's administration, state officials quietly increased the size of the Road Home management contract from $756 million to $912 million, rewarding a contractor the Legislature wanted to fire, auditors questioned and thousands of homeowner applicants cursed.

The Blanco administration never told the public about the 25 percent compensation increase for ICF International that was added to the three-year Road Home contract Dec. 7. The Times-Picayune discovered the change this week during a review of the program's latest budget estimates, in which the Louisiana Recovery Authority shows it's setting aside enough to pay the full $156 million increase.
The story goes on to note that Blanco's administration approved the raise without notifying the legislature, which is supposed to review large recovery contracts. State officials presented a Road Home budget update to a legislative budget committee a week after the decision but did not mention the raise.

New Louisiana Recovery Authority Director Paul Rainwater, who was appointed by Gov. Bobby Jindal and given greater control over Road Home, said a raise was needed but questioned the amount and the process. He said he has contacted the legislative auditor to investigate and promised to make the findings public.

Earlier this week, ICF International released its fourth-quarter earnings, reporting revenues of $186.4 million -- "substantially above the $113.9 million reported for last year's fourth quarter." The Road Home contract accounted for the bulk of that revenue, totaling $108.8 million in the 2007 fourth quarter compared to $60.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2006. In the earnings release, company officials said the Road Home raise was needed to cover increased program management costs resulting from the receipt of about 50 percent more applications than originally estimated.

The ICF's dealings in Louisiana have raised ethical questions before. The company first got involved in the post-hurricane rebuilding effort when its Emergency Management Services subsidiary won a $900,000 contract to help the state decided how to spend federal grant money, helping develop what would eventually become the Road Home program. At the same time it was carrying out that work, ICF decided to seek the lucrative administration contract.

While it was pursing that deal, the formerly private company filed paperwork for an initial public offering of stock. It went ahead with that offering in October 2006 -- shortly after winning the contract from Louisiana. That same year, ICF paid its executives bonuses about five times higher than the previous year.

Clearly, the Road Home has been very good for ICF. But with more than 50,000 grant applicants still waiting for payments more than two and a half years after the storm, there are some Louisianans who don't think ICF has been very good for the Road Home -- and who rightly question whether it deserves such generous backroom rewards.

Labels: , , , ,

posted by Sue Sturgis at 12:54 PM | Email this post

Friday, March 07, 2008

Blanco speaks on Katrina's lessons at UNC

Former Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Blanco is on the lecture circuit these days talking about lessons learned from Hurricane Katrina. She gave her first speech as a former governor outside her home state last month at the University of Arkansas Clinton School of Public Service, and last night she delivered the annual Charleston Area Alumni Lecture in Southern Affairs at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Blanco, a Democrat, chose not to run for re-election and left office in January. She was succeeded by Republican Bobby Jindal, who she had defeated four years earlier. She described leaving as a "blessed ending" and said she "can't stop smiling from ear to ear" to have her life back.

Noting that any community can be turned upside down in an instant, she emphasized that emergency planning must not be an afterthought. Blanco offered four key things Katrina taught her:

1. "You cannot coordinate if you cannot communicate," she said.

Blanco recounted the complete collapse of Louisiana's communications infrastructure in the wake of the storm, as winds knocked over cell phone towers and floodwaters inundated BellSouth's facilities. She told of National Guard officers being forced to deliver important messages by bicycle.

"Communities should invest in communications systems that can withstand hell or high water," she said.

2. "Be prepared to be on your own for the first 72 hours after a disaster," she advised.

Blanco pointed to the federal government's well-documented failure to respond to the Katrina disaster in a timely way, with the Bush administration not dispatching the Army to Louisiana until five days after the storm. She thanked North Carolina for promptly sending National Guard troops -- and for taking in some 6,000 displaced persons.

3. "You cannot meet unlimited needs with limited resources," she observed, urging the formation of compacts between states to help each other in the event of a major disaster.

Blanco pointed to other instances where greater coordination and planning was needed. For example, nursing homes that arranged for buses to rescue residents sometimes ended up contracting for the same buses. Commercial airlines concerned about the cost of flying into New Orleans with empty planes canceled flights, which meant that tourists had to be evacuated under duress. And the Army Corps of Engineers based its plan for distributing commodities on the assumption that people would be able to drive to pick them up -- even though many of those who stayed behind didn't have cars or lost them in the flood.

4. "When systems go down, paranoia sets in, and the media cycle spins out of control," she warned.

Blanco noted that news outlets reported horrific stories of violence in the storm's aftermath that were later found to be exaggerated or wholly inaccurate. She pointed to the problems that can arise when hordes of reporters descend on a disaster area, calling it "unconscionable" to give reporters space on rescue boats or helicopters when people still need to be saved.

The former governor had strong criticism for the Bush administration, which she blasted not only for failing to promptly help the storm's victims but also for trying to shift the blame for its failed response to state officials. That in turn threatened to create other problems, as Blanco's staff got sidetracked trying to correct the record.

"I ordered my staff to quit trying to defend me against the game of gotcha," she said.

In closing, Blanco had effusive praise for the response of the American people, and for the numerous organizations and individuals that have come to the Gulf Coast and turned New Orleans into a laboratory for public service.

"Ten years from now, Louisiana will surpass our dreams," she predicted. "Its robust economy will be a source of pride for the South."

Following the hour-long talk, Blanco answered questions for about half an hour, addressing the rebuilding of the levees, the misinformation spread about the actions she took in advance of the storm, her controversial shoot-to-kill order (which she said came only to quell the fear of violence that was paralyzing rescue efforts), and the urgent need to reform the federal Stafford Act governing disaster response.

In the final question of the night, she was asked whether she has any plans to re-enter politics.

"I'm planning to write my book to tell my story," she said to enthusiastic applause.

Labels: , , , ,

posted by Sue Sturgis at 4:22 PM | Email this post

Thursday, March 06, 2008

Welcome to New Orlanta

With the third anniversary of Hurricane Katrina approaching, it's becoming clear that many New Orleans residents displaced by the disaster won't be coming home any time soon. As Bill Quigley recently reported, half of the city's displaced working poor, elderly and disabled residents still have not returned, and demolition of the city's public housing stock continues despite the protests of international human rights officials.

Given that harsh reality, some of Katrina's displaced are stepping up organizing efforts in the communities where they live now. In Atlanta, for example, they recently created Network New Orlanta, a social networking community with a mission to connect the people of New Orleans who are now living in Georgia's biggest city:
The goal of the social network is to pool and identify financial resources, job placement and business opportunities, mental healthcare access and educational advancement programs that will assist in stabilizing families [affected] by Hurricane Katrina. Network New Orlanta further plans to serve as a watchdog organization that will advocate, lobby and demand accountability of elected officials and agencies fundraising on behalf of Hurricane Katrina families. Organizers are all natives and supporters of New Orleans who are dedicated to the rebuilding progress and process and the quality of life for those who remain displaced.
The first Network NewOrlanta mixer will take place on March 15 at Blaxx Entertainment Complex, 1245 Fowler St., from 9 p.m. to 1 a.m. and will feature traditional New Orleans food and cocktails. Says ChiQ Simms, a publicist who's one of the event's organizers:
"It is important that we gather more frequently to effect change for ourselves. It is vital that we posture ourselves to be a part of the solution. Our message is about prioritizing New Orleans people, not the politics."
For more information about Network New Orlanta and the upcoming mixer, contact Sandy at sugathesoutherndiva [at] gmail.com. To make a financial or in-kind donation, call the group's offices at 404-816-6000 or e-mail divadend [at] bellsouth.net.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

posted by Sue Sturgis at 2:29 PM | Email this post

Wednesday, January 09, 2008

Louisiana's Landrieu faces bribery complaints over education earmark

The watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington filed complaints this week with the Department of Justice, the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Louisiana and the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Texas seeking an investigation into whether Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) violated federal bribery law by including a $2 million earmark for Voyager Expanded Learning in a bill four days after receiving $30,000 in campaign contributions from company executives and their relatives. The organization also requested a Senate Ethics Committee probe into Landrieu's action, which occurred in November 2001. According to CREW:
Randy Best, a top Republican donor and Bush pioneer, founded Voyager, an educational products company and rather than selling the company's reading program to school districts, hired lobbyists to obtain earmarks for it. Although the House had appropriated $1 million for his program for the D.C. public schools, Best still needed a Senate sponsor. A lobbyist arranged a meeting with Sen. Landrieu, the chair of the Appropriations subcommittee responsible for the District of Columbia, to press for an earmark. Shortly after Sen. Landrieu met with Best, a member of Sen. Landrieu's staff asked him to hold a fundraiser for her and he agreed. After the fundraiser, she received $30,000 in campaign contributions from individuals associated with the company -- donors who had never before contributed to her. Four days after she received the money, she inserted an earmark into a D.C. appropriations bill, giving D.C. schools $2 million to buy Best's reading program, which was unproven and had not been requested by the school system.
Best, a Texas businessman who made a fortune selling cheerleading equipment to schools, has earned millions off contracts awarded under the Bush administration’s Reading First initiative, according to ABC News. Congressional investigators have charged that the administration awarded the Reading First contracts based on politics rather than merit, and the Department of Education's Inspector General released a report [PDF] last year documenting conflicts of interest and other problems with the program.

This is not the first time that Best has been accused of using ethically questionable practices to promote his business interests, according to Texans for Public Justice:
The Dallas Observer, for example, reported that Voyager hired the school superintendents of Dallas and Richardson, Texas, after their districts awarded major contracts to Voyager. Then-Governor George Bush received $45,400 from Best and other Voyager sources around the time that he endorsed spending $25 million in state funds on after-school programs. Georgia state School Superintendent Linda Schrenko went behind the backs of her state Board of Education to award a $1.1 million grant to Richmond County for a reading program in 2001. A month after the county awarded that contract to Voyager, top company executives contributed $56,750 to Schrenko’s failed gubernatorial bid.
Landrieu’s office released a statement [PDF] calling CREW's complaint "factually flawed" and pointing to the senator's longstanding support of the Voyager program. But CREW fired back with its own statement noting that Landrieu's response failed to address the key allegation: that it looks like she inserted an earmark in return for money.

"Senator Landrieu appears to have traded a $2 million earmark for $30,000 in campaign contributions," said CREW Executive Director Melanie Sloan. "The Department of Justice and the Senate Ethics Committee should look into this matter immediately. Members of Congress need to understand that trading earmarks for campaign funds is illegal -- no exceptions."

Labels: ,

posted by Sue Sturgis at 3:13 PM | Email this post

Italian nuclear waste may be coming to the South

In recent weeks the world has witnessed images of enormous heaps of household trash piled up on the streets of Naples, Italy after the city ran out of places to put it.

Apparently that's not the Italians' only waste disposal problem.

Italy also lacks a place to dispose of its radioactive waste -- and it's looking for answers in the U.S. South. The (Columbia, S.C.) State reports that Energy Solutions of Utah is seeking federal permission to import up to 20,000 tons -- that's a million cubic feet -- of so-called "low-level" radioactive waste from Italy through the ports of Charleston and New Orleans for disposal in the United States. The plan involves recycling most of the waste in Tennessee, with the rest to be buried in Utah.

But some environmentalists in South Carolina worry that the toxic stuff could end up in the state's Barnwell County nuclear waste dump run by Energy Solutions. However, the company says it won't bury the waste at that site, which is scheduled to close this summer. The Barnwell landfill -- the only facility in the nation that takes the most toxic kinds of low-level waste – has leaked and is contaminating local groundwater supplies.

South Carolina State Sen. Joel Lourie (D-Richland) thinks Italy should keep its nuclear waste:
"Do we want to promote that kind of industry in America, where we accept everyone else's nuclear waste, or should we encourage other countries to deal with it on their own soil?" Lourie said.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is currently considering Energy Solutions' request, but critics of the disposal plan say Congress should take up the matter of importing other countries' nuclear waste.

Labels: , , , ,

posted by Sue Sturgis at 11:45 AM | Email this post

Friday, November 09, 2007

Gulf Watch: Water bill veto override good news for La.

The first congressional veto override in President Bush's seven-year term is especially welcome news in Louisiana, which is set to receive almost 30 percent of the $23 billion allotted by the Water Resources Development Act.

According to an analysis published in today's New Orleans Times-Picayune, the legislation gives the state $6.9 billion -- including $1.9 billion for Louisiana coastal restoration projects and $986 million for hurricane protection work. The measure also includes money for closing the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet and for creating a Coastal Louisiana Ecosystem Protection and Restoration Task Force, among other things.

In more good news for Louisiana, the House yesterday overwhelmingly approved a compromise agreement on a non-war defense spending bill that provides $3 billion for the state's cash-strapped Road Home program. The Senate is expected to take up the measure soon.

Labels: , ,

posted by Sue Sturgis at 12:43 PM | Email this post

Thursday, November 08, 2007

Gulf Watch: Louisiana AG files suit against insurers -- as well as their software providers and advisors

Louisiana's outgoing Attorney General has borrowed a page from the playbook of his Mississippi counterpart and filed suit against insurance companies for their treatment of policyholders in the wake of Hurricane Katrina.

AG Charles C. Foti Jr. yesterday announced that his office has filed a petition against Allstate, State Farm, Farmers, Standard Fire (better known as Travelers), USAA and Lafayette, a division of United Fire Group. But Foti's suit goes beyond that filed in Mississippi by also naming Xactware Solutions and Marshall & Swift/Boeckh, which manufacture claims-processing software used by the insurers, and Xactware's parent company, insurance data collector Insurance Service Office. The petition also targets McKinsey & Co., a business consulting firm that has advised many major insurers.

According to a statement from Foti's office:
The petition, filed in New Orleans Civil District Court, alleges the above companies have participated in an on-going scheme to rig the value of property damage claims paid by insurance companies to their insureds. They allegedly used damage-estimating software programs to engage in horizontal price-fixing as well. The combination allegedly artificially held down property damage claim payouts with the intended goal of increasing the profits of each company involved. When Hurricanes Katrina and Rita struck Louisiana in 2005, virtually all of the property damage insurers were setting premiums and adjusting claims under this alleged scheme.

"This alleged scheme gave insurers an unjust advantage over policy holders, which they used before, during and after one of the greatest disasters this country has ever suffered, by reaping huge profits from the misfortunes of persons whom they pledged to protect from the risk of loss. I believe this unjust advantage resulted in the unjust enrichment of themselves to the detriment of the state, policy holders, and commerce in Louisiana," stated Attorney General Foti. "But to be clear, these abuses were not new to the recent hurricanes," General Foti added.
Foti's suit was filed in conjunction with a number of other attorneys: Joseph McKernan of Baton Rouge, Mark Glago of New Orleans, and the New Orleans law firms of Herman, Herman, Katz & Cotlar and Capitelli & Wicker, according to the New Orleans Times-Picayune. The firms are working with Louisiana's assistant attorney general for antitrust issues without any promises of legal fees.

Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood filed suit against insurance companies soon after Katrina. He dropped his criminal probe earlier this year when State Farm agreed to reconsider thousands of claims. Last week, however, State Farm sued Hood, accusing him of violating the terms of the deal and harassing the company. This week a federal judge extended a restraining order preventing Hood from continuing a criminal investigation into State Farm.

Foti's suit draws on the ideas of New Mexico attorney David Berardinelli, who wrote a book titled From Good Hands to Boxing Gloves about McKinsey's work for Allstate. The book's title was inspired by a McKinsey document Berardinelli obtained advising Allstate to don boxing gloves for any policyholder who doesn't accept a settlement offer for pennies on the dollar.

Labels: ,

posted by Sue Sturgis at 4:41 PM | Email this post

Wednesday, November 07, 2007

Gulf Watch: Defense bill comes to Road Home's rescue

House and Senate members negotiating a Defense Department spending bill yesterday agreed to tuck an extra $3 billion into the legislation for Louisiana's Road Home post-Katrina rebuilding program, which is facing an estimated $3 billion to $4.5 billion shortfall.

Pushing for the funds was Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.), who found a sympathetic ear in Appropriations Committee Chairman Robert Byrd (D-W.V.), according to a statement from Landrieu's office:
"A fundamental key to the recovery of the Gulf Coast is ensuring Louisiana's homeowners the availability of resources they need to rebuild their homes and communities," Chairman Byrd said. "The Road Home program is an example of the many steps Congress is taking to help the region through its long-term recovery. The people of Louisiana have a strong champion in Senator Landrieu, and I remain committed to working with her to restore the Gulf Coast."
While Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) is supporting the measure, there are questions about whether his Senate Republican colleagues will do the same, the New Orleans Times-Picayune reports:
Democrats want to wait until early next year to consider more money for the war in a separate bill. But Republicans are pushing for "bridge funding" in the Pentagon spending bill to ensure resources for the troops are not interrupted while a deeply divided Congress figures out how much it wants to spend on an increasingly unpopular conflict.
Among those raising concerns about the bill's lack of Iraq war money is Sen. Thad Cochran of Mississippi, the Appropriation Committee's ranking Republican. A Cochran aide told the newspaper that the Senator would wait to see how the Iraq funding issue is settled before announcing his stance on the legislation.

According to the latest official statistics, the Road Home program has received 185,908 applications for assistance to date and held 67,781 closings, with an average award of $66,291.

Labels: , , ,

posted by Sue Sturgis at 12:19 PM | Email this post

Monday, October 29, 2007

One step forward in La. race relations -- and one step back

Last week, Piyush "Bobby" Jindal became the first non-white governor of Louisiana since Reconstruction -- and the first Indian-American governor in U.S. history. The Republican congressman will succeed Democratic Gov. Kathleen Blanco after winning 54 percent of the vote in last Saturday's jungle primary. He'll take office in January.

The last non-white to serve as governor of Louisiana was P.B.S. Pinchback, a former Union soldier and Republican who held the office from Dec. 9, 1872 to Jan. 13, 1873 after impeachment charges were brought against his predecessor and party mate, Henry Clay Warmoth. The first non-white governor of any U.S. state following Pinchback's brief time in office was L. Douglas Wilder, who was elected governor of Virginia in 1989.

Jindal's victory shows how far we've come as a nation since 1923, when in United States vs. Thind the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Indians were non-whites and thus ineligible for citizenship. Back in Jindal's ancestral village of Khanpura, his victory was reportedly celebrated with sweets and bhangra dancing.

But when it comes to matters of race, perhaps Louisiana politics haven't come quite as far as Jindal's election seems to suggest.

Just four months before Jindal's victory, Keith Rush was elected to the Louisiana Republican State Central Committee, the governing body of the state GOP. A right-wing radio talk show host, Rush has close ties to former Ku Klux Klan Imperial Wizard David Duke, who lost his 1991 Louisiana gubernatorial bid. As the Southern Poverty Law Center recently reported:
When Duke ran for governor in 1991 (winning, shockingly, nearly 700,000 votes), he backed Rush's candidacy for the Jefferson Parish Council, telling his supporters that Rush "thinks like we do." In one of Rush's own campaign fliers, entitled "Who Is This Racist?" Rush answered his own question: "This racist believes that 'real' racism thrives on affirmative action programs." Rush also was a featured guest speaker at "Duke Fest," held July 4, 1991, in New Orleans.
SPLC points out that the story of Rush's Duke ties was originally reported by the blog Your Right Hand Thief after a tip from the person behind the now-defunct blog, The Flaming Liberal. As YRHT wrote:
Can we really celebrate progress when former David Duke supporters like Keith Rush are elected to the governing arm of the state Republican party?

Call me liberal, but I don't think so.

Labels: , ,

posted by Sue Sturgis at 4:52 PM | Email this post

Friday, October 19, 2007

Pigskin and voting booths: will football throw the Louisiana election?

On Wednesday, we wrote about how the post-Katrina demographic shift will impact Louisiana elections. But a new story at Stateline.org wonders if another wildcard factor will impact the race: football.

Louisiana voters will vote for a new governor this weekend -- and leader Rep. Bobby Jindal (R) is worried a competing LSU game might affect the outcome:
The country could have its first new governor of the 2007 elections this Saturday (Oct. 20) if U.S. Rep. Bobby Jindal (R-La.) holds on to his lead and wins a majority of the vote in Louisiana’s gubernatorial primary. But the decision could hinge on a football game.

Only in Louisiana, known for its peculiar election laws and devotion to college football, could a Louisiana State University football once again play a role in deciding the victor in a governor’s race.

Jindal is worried that voters will be so distracted by this Saturday’s LSU-Auburn University football game — held the same day as the primary — that they will forget to vote.

The last time Jindal made a bid for the governor’s mansion in 2003, the LSU Tigers played the Crimson Tide in Alabama on Election Day. “I can’t tell you how many people came up to me and said, `I was going to vote for you, but I went to the game,’” Jindal told The Associated Press earlier this month.
This weekend is also the start of deer hunting season -- adding to Jindal's fears that he won't get the 50% of the vote he needs to avoid a run-off election next month.

Labels: ,

posted by Chris Kromm at 3:12 PM | Email this post

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

Katrina having a dramatic impact on Louisiana politics

Why is Hurricane Katrina and the Gulf Coast recovery an important national issue? There are lots of reasons, but a big one is political.

The failing Gulf Coast recovery, which has kept at least a third of those displaced by Katrina from coming home, has dramatically changed the political map of Louisiana and the South.

The New Orleans Times-Picayune today offers one of the first assessments of the partisan impact of slow-moving Gulf recovery:
A few trends seem certain ... The number of Democrats, both in real numbers and as a percentage of the electorate, is continuing to fall. Registered Democrats make up 53 percent of the voting rolls, down from 57 percent in 2003.

Nearly 79,000 fewer Democrats are registered now than four years ago, while Republicans have gained more than 50,000.
Complicating the picture is that fact that many who haven't returned are still on the voter rolls, meaning the partisan impact will be even larger after the lists are cleaned next year:
A federally regulated cycle of voter roll scrubbing will occur late next year that likely will clear a large number of registrants off the state's list. In 2010 a new census will be conducted, resulting in fresh population figures in 2011 and potentially new political districting in 2012.
In the short term, this will definitely help candidates like GOP gubernatorial hopeful Bobby Jindal and other Louisiana Republicans, who are celebrating their party's good fortunes even as the party struggles nationally.

But there is another trend on the horizon: like other states, Louisiana has been witnessing a steady rise in Latino voters. This was only accelerated by the influx of a new immigrant workforce for post-Katrina rebuilding. The number of Louisiana voters who identify their race as "other" has grown by 15,000 over the last four years, which Louisiana's secretary of state says are largely Latino voters.

Labels: , ,

posted by Chris Kromm at 3:30 PM | Email this post

Tuesday, October 16, 2007

Gulf Watch: La. leaders visit Washington to make a pitch for more Road Home money

Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Blanco traveled to Capitol Hill yesterday to ask federal lawmakers to provide the additional $3 billion to $4 billion needed to fully fund the states' Road Home program, which assists residents whose homes were damaged or destroyed by Hurricane Katrina.

Traveling with the governor were New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin, city recovery director Ed Blakely, Louisiana Recovery Authority Chair Dr. Norman C. Francis, LRA Board Member David Voelker, and LRA Executive Director Andy Kopplin. The group will continue meeting today with members of Congress to make the case for additional funds.

"The Road Home is the largest housing program ever launched in response to a major disaster, and the size and scope of its need has simply surpassed early federal estimates," Blanco said in a statement. "The program is projected to serve nearly 50,000 more homeowners than originally anticipated by FEMA, and is on track to run out of funding in January, less than 100 days from today. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Majority Whip Jim Clyburn and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and their colleagues have been generous in their commitment to fund this program. Now we urge all Members of Congress to help finish the job."

According to the latest published statistics, the program has received more than 184,000 applications, and more than 60,000 homeowners have received awards totaling over $3.75 billion. At the current rate of pay-outs and the current average award per grant of about $66,000 per homeowner, the Road Home program is projected to run out of money by year's end, according to Blanco.

Louisiana has asked Congress for $3.3 billion in additional funding and for a legislative directive to FEMA that will allow the state to utilize $1.17 billion of Hazard Mitigation Grant Program funds that have been allocated but tangled in red tape for more than a year. At the same time, the Louisiana legislature has also committed $1 billion to fill the gap.

According to an analysis by ICF International, the Virginia-based contractor running the program (which itself has come under fire for its performance), three main factors have contributed to the deficit:

* An increase in eligible homeowners. About 50,000 additional homeowners with major or severe damage are expected to be found eligible, far more than FEMA initially thought.

* Actual damages are higher than FEMA estimated. The level of damage per house and construction costs have been significantly greater than anticipated.

* Lower than expected insurance payments to homeowners. On average, insurance payments are covering a smaller portion of damages than initially expected.

Labels: , ,

posted by Sue Sturgis at 11:25 AM | Email this post

Monday, October 15, 2007

Gulf Watch: Bush administration de-funds mental health services for Katrina-scarred children

A Louisiana State University program that provides mental health services for children traumatized by Hurricane Katrina faces cutbacks as a result of the Bush administration's rejection of a $400,000 grant application, the New Orleans Times-Picayune reports. The move comes despite a congressional directive that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services should give "high priority" to grants for programs that treat hurricane victims.

The Louisiana Rural Trauma Services Center, which operates out of the LSU Health Sciences Center, initially received a four-year federal grant in 2003. The program sends mental health professionals into schools, courts and Head Start programs in Orleans, Plaquemines and St. Bernard parishes to evaluate children for signs of mental illness and provide treatment, and it also trains school workers to recognize symptoms of mental illness.

The center's fiscal year 2006 grant application specified that the money was being used to serve "children and adolescents exposed to traumatic events in Louisiana."

Program Co-Director Dr. Howard Osofsky learned the application had been rejected last last month, according to the Times-Picayune. Without those funds, the program will have to be cut back "considerably," he said -- and that could be devastating:
"The children are the most traumatized in the United States," said Howard Osofsky, chairman of the psychiatry department at LSU Health Sciences Center. "If we are going to prevent the scars and give them the best chance to succeed, they really need these services."
Studies have found that children whose lives were directly affected by Hurricane Katrina suffered lingering psychological stress. A survey of displaced children in the New Orleans area conducted by the LSU Health Sciences Center found that 54 percent of the children surveyed experienced symptoms that put them in need of further mental health care, while screening data collected from storm-displaced children returning to New Orleans and St. Bernard parishes indicated that over 31 percent reported clinically significant symptoms of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder.

Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) told the paper that when the fiscal 2008 HHS spending bill comes to the Senate floor this week as expected, she plans to offer an amendment that would direct $400,000 in grant money to the jeopardized program.

Labels: , ,

posted by Sue Sturgis at 2:53 PM | Email this post

Friday, October 05, 2007

Gulf Watch: Reports confirm that Mississippi received more than its fair share of federal Katrina aid

A report released this week by the Government Accountability Office is critical of the way the Federal Emergency Management Agency administered an alternative housing program for people displaced by Hurricane Katrina.

The methodology that FEMA used for the Alternative Housing Pilot Program deviated from most competitive grant programs run by federal agencies, and as a result unfairly funneled $275 million of the available $388 million to Mississippi. By taking a different approach, the GAO said, FEMA could have directed more than $140 million to three separate housing projects in Louisiana rather than the $74.5 million directed to one project that's still not underway.

The findings confirm charges made by Louisiana officials -- and that my colleague Chris Kromm and I reported on earlier this year for Salon.com -- that the politicization of the post-Katrina aid allocation process resulted in Republican-controlled Mississippi receiving disproportionately more money for the damage it suffered than its Democrat-led neighbor. As we reported then and as others have also noted, the irony is that Mississippi's recovery has been moving at a painfully slow pace for the neediest residents despite the fact that the federal government has assisted the state so generously.

This is what Adam Sharp, a spokesperson for the office of U.S. Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.), told the New Orleans Times-Picayune about GAO's findings:
"We saw something that walked like a duck, talked like a duck and now other branches of government are telling us it's a duck," Sharp said.
The GAO report comes on the heels of another study (PDF) released last month that also documents disparities in post-Katrina aid for Mississippi and Louisiana.

That study -- part of the GulfGov series from the Public Affairs Research Council of Louisiana and the Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government -- examined funds allocated through FEMA's Public Assistance program as well as the Department of Housing and Urban Development's Community Development Block Grant program. It found that the amount of federal aid provided to Mississippi and Louisiana through those programs has not been proportional to the amount of damage each state suffered, and that what it called the "sluggishness" of aid distribution continues to be the primary concern of state and local officials.

Labels: , , ,

posted by Sue Sturgis at 3:06 PM | Email this post

Wednesday, October 03, 2007

The Justice That Jena Demands

by Xochitl Bervera

I want to tell you about Emmanuelle Narcisse. He was a tall, slim, handsome young man who was killed by a guard at the Bridge City Correctional Center for Youth -- a Louisiana juvenile prison -- in 2003. Apparently, he was "fussing" in line, talking back to a guard. The guard punched him in the face, one blow, and Emmanuelle went down backwards, slamming his head on the concrete. He took his last breath there behind the barbed wire of that state run facility. The guard was suspended with pay during the investigation. No indictment was ever filed against him.

There is also Tobias Kingsley*, sentenced when he was 15 to two years in juvenile prison for sneaking into a hotel swimming pool (his first offense). Tobias endured physical and sexual abuse inside the prison. He said that guards traded sex with kids for drugs and cigarettes, and sometimes set kids up to fight one another, making cash bets on the winner. His mama said he was never the same after he came home. She said the nightmares, the violence, the paranoia persisted years after the private lawyers helped him come home early. His battles with addiction and depression are not yet over.

And there is Shareef Cousin, who was tried as an adult and sent to death row in the state of Louisiana for a murder that he didn't commit. Shareef spent from age 16 to age 26 behind bars, the majority of those years isolated in Angola's Death Row, because an over zealous prosecutor didn't care that the evidence didn't really add up. After all, it was only a young Black man's life on the line.

These are young Black men who have encountered Louisiana's criminal justice system and who I know because their mothers have become proud members of Families and Friends of Louisiana's Incarcerated Children (FFLIC), the organization I have worked for over the last 7 years. These stories are about young men who have experienced incredible injustice, not unlike the Jena 6, only the national spotlight has never shined on them.

There are hundreds more. Thousands. Every day in the state of Louisiana (and in most states in this nation), injustices of epic proportions are taking place in our criminal and juvenile justice systems. We, those of us who live here, fight here, and organize here, know hundreds of families and young people -- often our own -- who've endured almost inconceivable levels of violence, abuse, neglect. And despite efforts to get someone, anyone to care and to act, these young people most often end up statistics in somebody's dismal report, or an anecdote in an article just like this. Because people don't care. Because these young people are not just poor, they are not just Black, they are criminals. (Click here to read the rest of the story.)


Hallelujah, someone noticed!

So, Hallelujah! Almost overnight it seems, the nation is looking deep into the heart of Louisiana's criminal justice system and seeing what we've been shouting about all these years! The racism, the blatant and unaccountable abuse of power masquerading as "justice." The slavery-like, Jim Crow-like, Bush-era prejudice and exploitation that has been the bedrock of white supremacy here and all over the Deep South for decades. Young people of color and mothers across the country are rising up saying, "We wont take it anymore! We demand justice!" The myth that the goal of the criminal justice system is protecting public safety is slowly unraveling as youth in Philadelphia, D.C., Oakland and mothers in Chicago, Jackson, and Birmingham make that most important of realizations, "that could have been me," "that could have been my child."

Many are asking, "Why now?" Why, of all the horrific incidents we've seen and exposed, is this the one that set off this fire of hope? Our young people have been shot and killed by police in every city in this nation, left to die of dehydration in local jails, railroaded by white juries and judges into serving 20, 30, 40 years in the prison plantations we call Angola, Parchman, and Sing Sing...

Let me tell you what my heart tells me. What really matters is not why, but what we plan to do with this moment now that it has arrived. What will the leaders, the youth, the elders of our movement do now?

Demanding justice for us all

Of course we must relentlessly and persistently demand justice for the Jena 6. But we must demand justice not only in the form of dropping the charges against these specific youth, but in the systematic and thorough rooting out of racism from all wings of the criminal justice systems across the United States of America.

Justice in Jena requires justice for all the others as well -- for all those who have suffered (and some who have died) silently behind bars and for their families who have fought without benefit of TV cameras and news reporters. It requires understanding that we will not, we can not achieve racial justice in this country if we do not fight against the criminal justice system, not just in individual instances, but in its institutionalized, systemic form. If we do not understand this -- and understand it deeply -- then this newly discovered energy, this tidal wave of outrage, this beautiful, intergenerational protesting isn't going to mean a damn thing past next week's news.

Justice in Jena requires all of us across the country to rise up against the racism and exploitation of the criminal justice system in all the places where we've come to see it and grown to accept it whether that's allowing for an abysmal public defender office in your county or turning away when you see a police officer trample the rights, and perhaps the body, of a fellow citizen. We must cast off once and for all the fundamental lie that the system has anything to do with criminals or justice or public safety. We must not back down, as so many movements have, when we are "crime-baited," accused of defending rapists and murderers, accused of defending crime itself. We must not make excuses for some parts of the system while protesting others. Similar to opposing the war, the whole war, and not simply certain battles or certain strategies, we must oppose the system in its entirety. We must dismiss, once and for all, the urge to discuss what's wrong with the system -- what's broken and needs to be fixed.

There is nothing broken in this system. In fact, usually (when it is not disrupted by 50,000 protestors), it is quite efficient at doing precisely what it was created to do. In the Deep South, the criminal justice system as we know it was built after the abolition of slavery, as part of the terror machine which destroyed the briefly federally protected Reconstruction era. Without nuance or subtlety, the system was created by wealthy, land owning whites to keep Blacks "in line," on the plantation, and working for next to nothing. Thanks to the Thirteenth Amendment which abolished slavery "except as a punishment for crime," laws and codes were invented that criminalized the very existence of Black people, police were hired to "enforce" those laws, and courts were mandated to send these newly created "criminals" to jail, or better yet, to be leased out to the very plantation owners they had been "freed" from just months before. The "justice" that was once meted out by slave owners who were "masters" of their property, was now taken care of by the law. The word "slave" was replaced by the word "criminal."

'Its not about race, it's about crime'

And yet, even with this history known, the stigma of criminality has remained so strong that our own movements have turned their backs on this issue over the years. Too many of our movements today want to dismiss, minimize, or overlook the necessity for a racial justice movement to prioritize organizing around criminal justice. Too often, our members meet others -- even those who should be allies -- who hold the entrenched belief that if a child is in prison, he must be "bad," he must have done something wrong. Even in progressive circles, organizations prefer to focus on the school children who need an education, the families who want affordable housing, the victims of street violence and drive-by shootings. These people are portrayed as "innocent" and deserving while currently and formerly incarcerated people are "guilty" -- of something.

Of course, it's a false dichotomy. Everyone knows that the same communities, the same people, who are most impacted by violence, the lack of health care, education, and housing are those most brutally impacted by policing and prisons. But the idea of the dichotomy has been essential to maintaining the stigma which justifies the system. And it's been a handy and effective tool to explain away a great deal of racial injustice in this country.

In Jena, when asked about the incident which led to the arrests of the Jena 6, a white librarian confidently explained to the NPR reporter, "It's not about race. It's about crime." Crime -- the ultimate proxy for race, the ultimate justification for racism.

What the future holds

I believe that this moment in history can be a pivotal one if we make it so. Up to 50,000 people marched in the streets of Jena recently -- the majority of them Black, many from the South. All were outraged by the blatant racism evidenced by the criminal justice system. This could be the beginning of the end for a system that should have been dismantled years ago.

But what we fight for and how we fight will make all the difference. The most obvious principle is that we cannot fight for the system to expand -- in any way. Asking for the white kids who hung the nooses to be charged, calling for Hate Crime Legislation -- these "solutions" just strengthen the system and give the same players -- the D.A., the judge, the jury -- more powers and more validation. If we understand that the system, at its core, is not designed to promote justice, then why would we ask for anything that expands its reach or powers? At the very least, we must call only for things which shrink the system -- closing prisons, freeing prisoners, cutting correction budgets, eliminating the death penalty and Life Without Parole, prohibiting juvenile transfers, and implementing sentencing reform.

We can also call for accountability from our elected officials. D.A.s and judges who perpetuate injustice, state representatives who are in bed with the corrections department and private prison companies -- these people should not be allowed to hold office. They should be ousted whether by recall, regular elections, or public pressure to step down.

But we can -- and should -- also call for the redirection of funds into a real public safety system. We must make it clear that the issue of public safety is fundamentally distinct from the issue of the criminal justice system. The only thing they have in common is rhetoric. Developing a public safety system which is prevention orientated, based on principles of restorative or transformative justice, prioritizes making the victim and community whole, and creatively resolving conflict is a powerful and noble goal and our communities should know more about these models and fight for them. A public safety system includes community based programs, quality education and the elimination of racism.

The families of the Jena 6 are ahead of the crowd in the list of demands they have made public: 1. Drop (or fairly reduce) All Charges; 2. Reinstate School Credits; 3. No Juvenile Records; 4. Investigate "Noose" Incident of September 1, 2006; 5. Remove Reed Walters from the District Attorney's Office; 6. Conduct Undoing Racism Workshops for Staff, Faculty, Administrators, Students, Parents and Community Members.

These are good demands for Jena. What will you demand in your hometown or city?

FFLIC is a membership based organization consisting primarily of mothers and grandmothers. These mothers and grandmothers have seen all sides of the farce known as the criminal justice system. They have been victims of sexual and physical violence who have either kept quiet or endured the humiliation and neglect of the D.A.'s office and the so-called victims' advocates. They have been forced to call the police on their children when mental illness or addiction has made them violent and no other services exist. They have visited their children in prison and seen boot marks on their faces. They have walked home alone through dark streets in poor neighborhoods where there are no programs, no services, no activities to keep young men busy and hopeful. They have seen their children beat by police officers, by prison guards, sometimes even by judges and district attorneys.

Standing on both sides of the system, these mothers will tell you that justice exists nowhere in the vicinity. It may sound radical, but it's time we start listening to those who have been through it all and tear down the disgrace that is the U.S. criminal justice system.

(*Name has been changed for purposes of confidentiality.)

Xochitl Bervera is co-director of Families and Friends of Louisiana's Incarcerated Children. She can be reached at xochitl@fflic.org. This article originally appeared in Left Turn Magazine. For resources to help you take action, click here and scroll to the bottom of the page.


Labels: , , ,

posted by Sue Sturgis at 5:04 PM | Email this post

Monday, September 24, 2007

National Lawyers Guild: Drop all charges against Jena 6 and investigate judge and prosecutor

The National Lawyers Guild -- the nation's first racially integrated bar association -- today called for the immediate release of Mychal Bell, one of the six black Louisiana high school students who have come to be known as the "Jena 6." The Guild also called for all charges against the Jena 6 to be dropped, and for the investigation and disbarment of Judge J.P. Mauffray and District Attorney Reed Walters:
Judge J.P. Mauffray and DA Reed Walters have engaged in a string of egregious actions, the most recent of which was the denial of bail for Bell on Friday. The NLG urges that: 1) The United States Department of Justice convene an immediate inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the arrests and prosecutions of the Jena 6; 2) Judge Mauffray be recused from presiding over Bell's juvenile court hearings or other proceedings; 3) The Louisiana Office of Disciplinary Counsel investigate Reed Walters for unethical and possibly illegal conduct; 4) The Louisiana Judiciary Commission investigate Judge Mauffray for unethical conduct; and 5) The Jena school district superintendent be removed from office.

"Contrary to what Reed Walters and J.P. Mauffray may think, Jena is subject to the same Constitution that the rest of the United States is," remarked Kerry McLean, member of the executive board of the NLG. "There have been numerous, brazen violations of the constitutional rights of the Jena 6. ... In addition to the constitutional violations, Walters and Mauffray have breached the ethical requirements of their offices. They should be made to answer for all of this."

There is an unequal justice system in Jena, where blacks are routinely the victims of discriminatory and oppressive treatment by officials.
To read the full NLG statement, click here.

Labels: , ,

posted by Sue Sturgis at 5:22 PM | Email this post

Tuesday, September 04, 2007

Charges reduced for some Jena 6 defendants

We have reported here previously on the controversial case of the so-called "Jena Six," a group of black high school students in a Louisiana town who were arrested and faced unusually harsh charges after an assault on a white schoolmate. Charges against two of the Six -- Carwin Jones and Theo Shaw -- were reduced today from attempted second-degree murder to aggravated second-degree battery. But it's doubtful that gives great comfort to them and their loved ones: Mychal Bell, another of the Six who was tried on those same reduced charges in June and convicted by an all-white jury, still faces as much as 22 years in prison when he is sentenced later this month, even though he was a juvenile at the time the incident took place. Robert Bailey Jr. and Bryant Purvis still face attempted murder charges, and another youth faces undisclosed juvenile charges. Bailey also faces firearm theft charges for wrestling away a gun from a white youth who brandished it during an argument outside a local convenience store and refusing to return it. The white youth was not charged.

Labels: , ,

posted by Sue Sturgis at 8:38 PM | Email this post

Wednesday, August 15, 2007

The Jena 6 and the movement for justice

Racism and Resistance: The Struggle to Free The Jena Six
By Jordan Flaherty
Guest Blogger

Almost a year ago, in the small northern Louisiana town of Jena, a group of white students hung three nooses from a tree in front of Jena High School. This set into motion a season of racial tension and incidents that culminated in six Black youths facing a lifetime in jail for a schoolyard fight.

The story that has unfolded since then is one of racism and injustice, but also of resistance and solidarity, as people from around the world have joined together with the families of the accused, lending legal and financial support, adding political pressure, and joining demonstrations and marches.

The nooses were hung after a Black student asked permission to sit under a tree that had been reserved by tradition for white students only. In response to the three nooses, nearly every Black student in the school stood under the tree in a spontaneous and powerful act of nonviolent protest. The town's district attorney quickly arrived, flanked by police officers, and told the Black students to stop making such a big deal over the nooses, which school officials termed to be a "harmless prank." The school assembly, like the schoolyard where all of this had begun, was divided by race, with the Black students on one side and the white students on the other. Directing his remarks to the Black students, District Attorney Reed Walters said, "I can make your lives disappear with a stroke of a pen."

The white students who confessed to hanging the nooses never received any meaningful punishment. Nor did the white students who months later beat up a Black student at a school party, nor did the white former student who threatened two Black students with a shotgun. But, after these incidents, when Black students got into a fight with a white student, six Black youths were charged with attempted murder, and now face a lifetime in prison. The Black students may not have been involved in the fight, but they were known to be organizers of the protest under the tree. The white student was briefly hospitalized, but had no major injuries and was socializing with friends at a school ring ceremony the evening of the fight.

The Black students were arrested immediately after the fight, in December of last year. School officials and police officials took statements from at least 44 witnesses to the fight. The statements do not paint a clear picture of who was involved. Statements from white students refer to "Black boys", but many testimonies are unclear as to the identities of who was involved. Some of the arrested youths are not implicated in the fight by any of the witnesses.

Despite this, when Mychal Bell, the first youth to go to trial, refused to take a deal in exchange for testifying against his friends, he was quickly convicted by an all-white jury. Bell's public defender Blane Williams, visibly angry at Bell and his parents because the youth did not take the deal, called no witnesses and gave no meaningful defense. This attorney's behavior gives a vivid example of our nation's broken and underfunded public defender system. Some have called Jena a throwback to the past, but in fact Jena presents a clear vision of the current state of our criminal justice system.

In Paris, Texas, a white teenager burns down her family's home and receives probation. A black teen shoves a hall monitor and gets seven years in prison. Genarlow Wilson, in Atlanta, is sentenced to 10 years in prison for participating in consensual oral sex with a 15-year-old when he was 17. Like these and many other cases, the case in Jena is textbook proof that there are still two systems of justice functioning in this country, one for Black people, and one for white. No serious observer can doubt that the students of Jena would never have faced charges if a Black student had been beaten instead of a white student. The unpunished incidents in the days and months leading up to the fight clearly demonstrate this. (read more here)



Local Resistance

Immediately after the arrests, parents of the accused began organizing. Their call, "Free the Jena Six," was initially heard by activists from other parts of Louisiana, such as the Lafayette public access TV show, "Community Defender," which was the first media from outside their immediate area to give coverage of the case. Non-corporate and grassroots media have been vital in spreading word of the case, beginning with blogs and YouTube videos, which then led to high profile stories on Democracy Now and in The Final Call.

Lasalle Parish where Jena is located is 85 percent white. The town is still mostly segregated -- from the white barber who refuses to cut Black hair to the white and Black parts of town, separated by an invisible line. Lasalle is also one of Louisiana's most wealthy parishes, with small oil rigs in many back yards contributing to area wealth. The parish is a major contributor to Republican politicians, and former Klansman and Louisiana gubernatorial candidate David Duke received a solid majority of local votes. Jena was also the former site of a notoriously brutal youth prison, which was closed after years of lawsuits and negative media exposure. The prison is now scheduled to be reopened as a private prison for the growth business of immigrant detentions

Three hundred supporters, most from the immediate region but some from as far away as California, Chicago and New York, descended on Jena on July 31 to protest District Attorney Reed Walters' conduct and call for dismissal of all charges. The largest groups included Millions More Movement delegations from Houston, Monroe and Shreveport, nearly 50 members of Families and