PO Box 531  •  Durham,NC 27702  •  Telephone: (919) 419-8311  •  Fax: (919) 419-8315

Thursday, May 31, 2007

Oil company profits and gas prices


Q1 2007 Q1 2006 % INCR
ExxonMobile $9.280B $8.400B 10%
Chevron $4.715B $3.996B 18%
ConocoPhillips $3.546B $3.291B 8%
National Avg. Regular $3.191 $2.848 12%


Share prices (source: Yahoo Finance):

Labels: ,

posted by R. Neal at 6:54 PM | Email this post

Special elections coming up in GA and LA

Political prognosticators Isaac Wood and Larry Sabato at the University of Virginia report today that there will be up to five special elections for the U.S. House in 2007 -- two of them in the South.

The first race will be to fill the vacant seat of deceased Georgia Republican Rep. Charlie Norwood (GA-10), who passed from lung cancer in February. His shoe-in replacement was thought to be State Senator Jim Whitehead (R). But then Whitehead started making public statements -- to his detriment, as Sabato notes:
In a column that appeared in The Elberton Star, Whitehead admitted suggesting that someone "probably ought to bomb" the University of Georgia ... Then, in a March 26 letter to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Whitehead claimed that liberals have been registering "known al-Qaida terrorists" to vote.
The lead Democrat in the fray is ex-Yahoo! executive Jim Marlow, who in the GOP-leaning district is mostly hoping to squeeze into a run-off with Whitehead, and from there bank on Whitehead's "self-destruction."

The other House seat likely to open up is Rep. Bobby Jindal's (R) LA-1 district, which many believe will be vacant if/when Jindal wins the 2007 Louisiana gubernatorial race. Jindal is such a formidable candidate in the contest to replace outgoing Gov. Kathleen Blanco that no major Democrat has risen to challenge him.

But don't call Jindal the winner yet. Jindal was heavily favored to win in 2003 -- but analysts think racism, more than anything, kept the Southeast Asian American from getting votes from GOP whites. And now, Wood and Sabato note, Democrats are not shy about playing to racism in hopes of stopping Jindal again:
Already, Democrats are subtly undermining Jindal by referring to him as "Piyush," his middle name. Actually, it isn't subtle at all: the goal of using his foreign sounding middle name is blatantly obvious, and smacks of racism, a tactic that should be condemned whether the insult is being hurled by Democrats or Republicans. We'll still bet on Jindal, just not heavily at this stage. He will need weak opponents and a strong aura of invincibility all the way to October in order to win.
UPDATE: Wood and Sabato are wrong -- Piyush is Jindal's given first name, not "middle name." But they're right about the intention, which is much the same as Fox News highlighting that Barak Obama's middle name is "Hussein." See here for a story in the New Orleans Times-Picayune about the issue.

Labels: , ,

posted by Chris Kromm at 4:31 PM | Email this post

Gulf Watch: Southern communities face high hurricane disaster risk

The Associated Press has identified five coastal areas of the United States that are particularly vulnerable to hurricane disasters -- and four of them are in the South.

The at-risk spots named by the AP are Florida's Lake Okeechobee, imperiled by the breach-prone Herbert Hoover Dike; Galveston, Texas, "sitting uneasily by the Gulf of Mexico, its residents limited to a single evacuation route"; New York City, "long spared a major storm but susceptible to a calamity of submerged subways and refugees caught in horrendous traffic jams"; North Carolina's Outer Banks, where experts warn that a Katrina-sized storm could wipe out 75 percent of the existing barrier islands; and Miami, "full of elderly people and others who might be trapped."

In an updated seasonal storm forecast released today, Colorado State University researcher William Gray predicted a 74 percent chance of a major hurricane hitting the U.S. coast in the season that begins tomorrow. He foresees 17 named storms and nine hurricanes -- five of them intense.

Meanwhile, a new Mason-Dixon poll released today finds that residents of the Atlantic and Gulf coasts are unprepared for a serious storm, with 61 percent of those surveyed saying they have no hurricane survival kit and 16 percent saying they might not evacuate even if ordered to do so.

Apparently, not all of us have learned Katrina's hard lessons.

Labels: , , ,

posted by Sue Sturgis at 4:16 PM | Email this post

Gulf Watch: FEMA clueless about toxic trailer warnings?

At a hearing of the House Homeland Security Committee on hurricane readiness held earlier this month, Chair Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) asked Federal Emergency Management Agency Director David Paulison to address complaints that trailers housing Katrina and Rita survivors have dangerous levels of formaldehyde, the Mississippi Clarion-Ledger reports:
Paulison said he was unaware the trailers posed any health threats.
So apparently Paulison wasn't paying attention when Sierra Club issued a warning a year ago in the form of a fact sheet titled "Toxic Trailers?: Tests reveal high formaldehyde levels in FEMA trailers." Samples taken by the environmental advocacy group found that 83 percent of FEMA trailers tested in Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi had levels of the chemical that exceeded recommended limits, with some of the trailers showing levels three times the safe limit.

Formaldehyde is emitted as vapors from insulating foams, adhesives used in wood products and carpeting, and some paints and other coating materials. Levels that surpass recommended limits can irritate the eyes and mucous membranes and cause headaches, sore throats and breathing problems. In addition, the International Agency for Research on Cancer has linked formaldehyde exposure to nasopharyngeal cancer.

But wait -- maybe Paulison was actually paying attention after all but simply thinks the problem is not his agency's. The paper goes on to say:
After the hearing, Paulison told reporters he was aware some trailers and mobile homes have high levels of formaldehyde gas. But he said it is the responsibility of hurricane victims to rid themselves of the danger.

"We've told people they can air those trailers out," Paulison said.
If only it were so easy. In fact, Becky Gillette, vice chair of the Sierra Club's Mississippi chapter, says tests found elevated formaldehyde levels in trailers that were 20 months old and have been aired out.

Besides ventilation, another technique recommended for reducing formaldehyde off-gassing is to seal the surfaces of the formaldehyde-containing products that are not already laminated or coated, according to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. That was also one of the recommendations offered by the Sierra Club -- but evidently not acted upon by FEMA.

Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), chair of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, once again has requested FEMA documents regarding the trailers. He first raised concerns and asked FEMA for more information about formaldehyde levels last August but told the paper he's received little response.

FEMA slow to respond to a crisis? Please, Mr. Paulison, tell us it isn't so.

(Photo of FEMA trailer in New Orleans' 9th Ward by Marvin Nauman for FEMA.)

Labels:

posted by Sue Sturgis at 2:13 PM | Email this post

Down home with Ol' Fred the Washington "outsider"

As Chris noted here yesterday, former Tennessee Senator and actor Fred Thompson has all but made it official that he is running for president in 2008.

The Nashville Tennessean had this article yesterday entitled "Thompson says he plans to run, wants to be 2008's outsider."

Relating an anecdote about creating an internet hit piece on Michael Moore, the article dropped a couple of names familiar to blogger Andy Axel at KnoxViews:
"And Mark Corallo and Ed McFadden had that camera there in 40 minutes," Jeri, who is sitting in on the interview, breaks in. Corallo and McFadden, aides to John Ashcroft when he was U.S. attorney general, have been helping Thompson behind the scenes.
Andy continues:
So, Mr. Former Senator (resident of McLean, VA and employee of NYC-based Dick Wolf Productions) has Mr. "former RNC communications director for Victory 2000" and Mr. "former speechwriter for John Ashcroft" already on speed dial. Hmm. Continuing DC experience... DC hacks on board... Where do the outsider bonafides begin?
He notes that Tennessee D.C. insiders Rep. Zach Wamp and former Senator Howard Baker, Jr. are on board. (The article says they were, in fact, the ones who first encouraged Thompson to run.)

Andy also notes that Thompson's latest wife, Jeri Kehn, was a "political operative working out of the D.C. firm of Verner Liipfert Bernhard McPherson & Hand around the time that they married. Her resume also includes stints at the Senate Republican Conference and the Republican National Committee."

If that's not connected enough, Politico reports:
The [Thompson campaign] chief operations officer will be Thomas J. Collamore, a former aide to Vice President George H.W. Bush and former vice president of public affairs for Philip Morris Companies Inc. In the George H.W. Bush administration, Collamore was an assistant secretary of commerce under Commerce Secretary Robert Mosbacher. In the Reagan administration, he was special assistant to Commerce Secretary Malcolm Baldrige.

That reflects the pedigrees of some of the key Republicans who are likely to join the campaign, advisers say. Republicans from the grass-roots level to President Bush's inner circle have expressed frustration with the current field of candidates, and so Thompson initially will likely get a lot of fawning attention from party leaders and the news media.
But wait, there's more:
Another rumored top Thompson staffer is Tim Griffin, the RNC operative who Karl Rove recently installed as US Attorney for Eastern Arkansas as part of Attorneygate [As Chris mentioned yesterday].

His spokesman is Mark Corallo [mentioned above], the former press flack for Karl Rove during the Scooter Libby trial.
Other "outside" inside-the-beltway baseball on Sen. Thompson's resume includes being a federal prosecutor and Watergate counsel, and a little moonlighting as a lobbyist on the side:
In case you were curious, Thompson represented Westinghouse and General Electric in the deregulation of the savings and loan industry, which eventually led to the S&L crisis of the 1980s. After leaving the Senate in 2002, he was paid $760,000 to protect the British reinsurance company Equitas from asbestos claims. He registered to represent foreign clients such as deposed Haitian leader Jean Baptiste Aristide, Toyota and a German mining company.

[..]

In 1994, Thompson's Democratic opponent, Congressman Jim Cooper, called him "a Gucci-wearing, Lincoln-driving, Perrier-drinking, Grey Poupon-spreading millionaire Washington special interest lobbyist."
Aw, shucks. That's just Ol' Fred bein' Fred, the down-to-earth "outsider" candidate.

Now that Fred Thompson is in, we're waiting for the other shoe to drop -- Al Gore's. Wouldn't it be a political spectacle of epic proportions if these two good ol' Tennessee boys were to square off out behind the barn in 2008? Developing...

Labels: ,

posted by R. Neal at 2:10 PM | Email this post

Is landing ThyssenKrupp plant really a win for Alabama?

That's the question the folks over at Citizens for Tax Justice pondered recently on their Talking Taxes blog. Louisiana also tried to lure the German company's $3.7 billion steel plant, which instead will be built north of Mobile in the community of Mount Vernon.

The plant will employ 2,700 people and generate at least 38,000 indirect jobs in the region over the next 20 years, according to the company.

But as Talking Taxes points out, the cost to Alabama will be considerable: $461.1 million in direct financial aid, including land acquisition, site preparation, worker training and road improvements; and $350.3 million in "abatements of sales, property and utility taxes by state and local governments."

In addition, the steel giant won't have to pay any state income tax for the next 30 years unless its tax liability exceeds $185 million in any year -- pretty unlikely considering that the tax for the entire state brought in a total of only $484 million in fiscal year 2006.

Keep in mind that all this taxpayer-funded assistance is going to a company whose second-quarter earnings announced earlier this month were $769 million -- even after being hit with a $646 million fine by the European Union for its involvement in an illegal elevator cartel.

Talking Taxes concludes:
So if Louisianans are looking for consolation in the wake of "losing" this smokestack-chasing contest, try this on: maybe this is a race they couldn't have afforded to win. And maybe Alabama will find they can't afford it either.

Labels: , , ,

posted by Sue Sturgis at 1:53 PM | Email this post

Wednesday, May 30, 2007

Election 2008: Thompson is (almost) in; who is he?

Back in March, R. Neal here at Facing South predicted that a "dark horse" candidate from the South -- especially someone like former Sen. Fred Thompson (R-TN) -- could change the 2008 presidential elections.

It's starting to look that way: The Caucus -- political blog of the New York Times -- reports today that Thompson is "taking formal steps toward a presidential bid," including setting up a fundraising committee. Caucus blogger Kate Phillips notes the hype surrounding the Law and Order star:
Mr. Thompson has generated a lot of excitement as a potential candidate, especially among conservative Republicans who have expressed dissatisfaction with the current group of 2008 G.O.P. contenders.
We've all seen Thompson on TV (it's impossible to avoid a L&O re-run in a round of channel-surfing), but what kind of politician is he? The most common comparison -- both for his screen-savvy charm and his seemingly-nebulous politics -- is Ronald Reagan.

I say "seemingly nebulous" because -- like Reagan -- Thompson has worked hard to project an image of being a populist "independent" who "bucks the party line." But in reality, he's a staunch conservative. In 1996, Michelle Cottle featured Thompson in the Washington Monthly after his election to the U.S. Senate:
In a database of congressional voting records maintained by the non-partisan Project Vote Smart, Thompson shares the No. 1 spot with a handful of senators who most consistently vote the Republican party line. And in a November 1995 analysis, Vote Smart lists him as having supported Contract With America items 100 percent of the time. So Thompson may be seen as a moderate, but his voting record has made him a darling of the far right. 'When Thompson was first elected, we were afraid he would prove to be a liberal Republican like Howard Baker," says John Davies, head of the Tennessee Conservative Union, "but we've been extremely pleased with his voting record so far."
That being said, it is surprising that he's seen as the champion for social conservatives: as Cottle notes, one of the few issues where he actually has "bucked the party line" is abortion. He identified himself in the 1990s as "pro-choice."

For more on Thompson's politics today, see Kevin Drum at Political Animal here and here.

UPDATE: Who will work on Thompson's campaign? The Wall Street Journal today reports (sub required) that Timothy Griffin, the former aid to Karl Rove and installed Arkansas attorney who (as we've reported here at Facing South) has been key to the U.S. attorney scandal, has "had discussions" with the Thompson crew. (Hat tip to TPM Muckraker)

Labels:

posted by Chris Kromm at 12:38 PM | Email this post

Gulf Watch: War spending bill nixes local match requirement

State and local governments in storm-stricken areas of the Gulf Coast will no longer have to put up their own money in order to get federal rebuilding funds, thanks to the emergency war spending bill approved by Congress last week and signed into law by President Bush.

The new law strikes the match requirement imposed by the Robert T. Stafford Act, a federal law governing disaster recovery efforts. The act normally imposes a 25 percent match requirement, which Bush reduced to 10 percent -- though that still proved onerous for devastated communities. The president had vetoed earlier legislation that waived the requirement, which he struck for New York following the 9/11 attacks.

As my Institute for Southern Studies colleague Chris Kromm and I reported in our recent Salon article on storm recovery in Mississippi, local elected officials in the Gulf blamed the requirement for slowing the pace of recovery in the region.

The language waiving the match requirement was written by Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.), who fought to ensure it was included in the bill approved by the Senate and sent to the president:
"This was a landmark vote for south Louisiana's continued recovery from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita and the flooding that followed," Sen. Landrieu said. "The local match requirement costs our communities millions of dollars while drowning them in thousands of forms and regulations. Louisiana needs more money and less paper. The insurmountable red tape slows recovery to a crawl, and this bill is a key step to cutting through it."
The measure also offers about $3 billion in assistance to hurricane-affected areas throughout the Gulf Region, including:

* Forgiveness of Federal Emergency Management Agency Community Disaster Loans when independent audits determine a community's fiscal recovery is insufficient to repay the debt after a three-year grace period;

* $1.3 billion in levee funding;

* $60 million to recruit teachers and principals for K-12 schools in storm-affected areas;

* $50 million for several crime-fighting efforts;

* $35 million for for storm-impacted transit services;

* $30 million to help meet expenses incurred by higher education institutions that were forced to close, relocate or curtail their activities as a result of the 2005 hurricanes;

* $25 million for disaster loans to small businesses; and

* Extension of the deadline to use $150 million in Social Services Block Grants from September 2007 to Sept. 30, 2008.

Labels:

posted by Sue Sturgis at 12:33 PM | Email this post

Gulf Watch: GAO finds no wrongdoing in N.O. pump contract

The Government Accountability Office has released a report into concerns that cronyism tainted a deal that led to more than 30 problematic flood-control pumps being installed in New Orleans. The federal watchdog agency found that while the Army Corps of Engineers rushed to install the pumps, there was no wrongdoing:
In order to increase the likelihood that pumping capacity would be in place when needed, the Corps utilized several tools to expedite and streamline the acquisition process. The Corps appears to have had a valid reason for each of the iterative decisions it made at each stage of the procurement process. The cumulative effect of these decisions resulted in one supplier -- Moving Water Industries Corporation -- being in the strongest competitive position to receive the contract for the pumping systems.
A Florida firm headed by a major Republican donor and former business partner of Jeb Bush, MWI is currently being sued by the U.S. Justice Department over allegations of corrupt taxpayer-backed dealings in Nigeria.

Of the two pump suppliers that the Corps considered for the New Orleans job, only MWI had actually manufactured a pump with the specifications being sought, according to the GAO.

However, the pumps -- which were plagued with numerous mechanical problems -- will come under more scrutiny. That's because the emergency war spending bill approved by Congress last week and signed into law by President Bush includes language seeking a technical review of the pumps, thanks to Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.). Said the senator in a statement on the legislation:
"Our recovery depends on confidence in our flood-control system," Sen. Landrieu said. "Reports that the Corps of Engineers installed faulty and untested pumps are gravely troubling. The supplemental spending bill will allow a technical review that will demonstrate what needs to be fixed so that we can make sure our communities are safe from flooding during future disasters."

Labels:

posted by Sue Sturgis at 12:30 PM | Email this post

Election 2008: Georgia joins Feb. 5 primary club

National pundits may be writing off the South in 2008, but don't tell Southern states that. In a bid to shake off being treated as the neglected stray dogs of presidential politics, state leaders are battling to put the South back on the electoral map.

Case in point: Georgia. Yesterday, the AP reports, Gov. Sonny Perdue (R) signed a bill to move the Peach State's presidential primary up to February 5, 2008. The move comes in the wake of Florida's decision to leapfrog up to January 29 for its primary, the same date as South Carolina. Texas appears close to also joining the February 5 primary club, which now includes 15 states.

Georgia's move not only puts another Southern state on the 2008 map -- it increases the voice of black (and to a lesser extent Asian American and Latino) voters in the primaries: 28% of registered voters in Georgia are African American.

Labels: ,

posted by Chris Kromm at 9:15 AM | Email this post

Tuesday, May 29, 2007

Guide to the immigration bill

The Senate is set to resume debate this week on a new "compromise" immigration bill (S.1348). This is a complicated bill and it's hard to find objective info.

In addition, many of the amendments are not incorporated in their final form into the version currently published at Thomas.loc.gov.

Read more for a roundup of information and commentary on the bill...



What the bill covers

There are eight titles in the bill. Here's a brief summary of each:

TITLE I--BORDER ENFORCEMENT: Increase in border patrol agents, technology assets (including aerial drones, electronic surveillance, etc.), checkpoints, ports of entry, border fences, human smuggling, cooperation with the Mexican government, biometric identification and tracking systems, and deploying National Guard for border protection.

TITLE II--INTERIOR ENFORCEMENT: Identification, detention, and removal of terrorists, regulation of gang members, alien smuggling, illegal entry and reentry, regulation of passport, visa, and immigration fraud offenses, incarceration of criminal aliens, deportation, sale of firearms to aliens, state assistance programs, and money laundering.

TITLE III--UNLAWFUL EMPLOYMENT OF ALIENS: Worksite enforcement, fraud detection, and antidiscrimination protections.

TITLE IV--NONIMMIGRANT AND IMMIGRANT VISA REFORM: Establishes a "Y Visa" Temporary Guest Worker program, lays out the visa requirements and employer obligations, sets numerical limitations, changes H-1B visa regulations, establishes a "willing worker" and "willing employer" databases, and enacts an extensive alien employment management system.

TITLE V--BACKLOG REDUCTION: Deals with eliminating the existing backlog of visa applications and regulations for various classes of workers and other immigrants.

TITLE VI--WORK AUTHORIZATION AND LEGALIZATION OF UNDOCUMENTED INDIVIDUALS: This section deals with illegal immigrants currently in the U.S., and implements the controversial "Z visa" program. It also covers immigrant education and health care benefits, strengthening American citizenship, and addressing poverty in Mexico.

TITLE VII--MISCELLANEOUS: Deals with immigration litigation, appeals, and review, designates personnel for immigration review and appeals, non-citizen membership in the armed forces, humanitarian provisions, requirements for naturalization, and various government study and information programs. It also establishes English as the official language of the United States and excludes illegal aliens from Congressional apportionment tabulations.

TITLE VIII--INTERCOUNTRY ADOPTION REFORM: Deals with international adoption procedures.

This is a huge, complicated bill that was only submitted in its final form over the weekend. It's somewhere between 350-450 pages. As Jeralyn Merritt says, it's difficult to comprehend how the Senate can effectively debate it when it is virtually impossible for anyone to have read it and studied it yet.

The best summary/interpretation of the bill so far is here:

American Immigration Lawyers Association (PDF format)

Another excellent summary is here:

Greg Siskind, immigration law firm of Siskind Susser Bland, P.C. (PDF format).

Differences from last year's attempt (S.2611) are highlighted in blue. These are essentially the "compromise" portions of the new bill.

Here is a shorter summary of the summary by the author.

Controversial provisions

The most controversial provisions are the "Y Visa" guest worker program and the "Z Visa" for illegal immigrants currently in the U.S.

The Y Visa guest worker program provides for:

• Y-1 visas for 400,000 non-seasonal guest workers, with market adjustments (Ed. note: an amendment last week reduced this figure to 200,000)

• Y-2A visas for agricultural seasonal workers, no limit

• Y-2B visas for 100,000 non-agricultural seasonal workers, with market adjustments

• Y-3 visas for spouses and minor children, no more than 20% of Y-1 total

• Y visa workers must be paid the prevailing wage

• Y-3 visa holders must have health insurance, and their principal Y visa holder must earn 150% of poverty level

• Y visas are issued for two years, and can be renewed after the owner leaves the country for twelve months

• Y visa employers must advertise jobs, submit to state employment agencies, show preference for U.S. workers, attest that no U.S. workers were available to do the work or will be displaced, pay worker impact/filing fees or provide insurance

The Z Visa legalization program provides for:

• Z-1 visas for undocumented aliens, must be employed, must prove continuous employment, must pay total of up to $5000 in penalties and fees, eligibility based on a new merit points system for permanent residents, requires fingerprinting and background check

• Employers are immune from prosecution for illegal hiring discovered by way of Z-1 applicant's documentation of employment

• Z-2 visas for spouses or elderly parents of Z-1

• Z-3 visas for children of Z-1 under 21

• Z-1 visas are portable to new employers, and Z-2 visa holders are authorized to work

• Z-1 applicant must return to country of origin to apply (the "touchback" provision), Z-2 and Z-3 relatives are not required to return

• Initial four year status for Z visa holder, with one four year extension for a total of eight years, after which they must pass the naturalization test, with some exceptions for disability

In addition, Z visas would only be available once a set of predefined triggers have been met. These include, 18,000 new border patrol officers, 200 miles of vehicle barriers and 350 miles of fencing, 70 ground-based radars and camera towers on southern border, deployment of four unmanned aerial vehicles, resources to detain 27,500 aliens per day on an annual basis, and implementation of secure identification tools.

Point system

The new point system applies to all immigrants who apply for permanent residency or naturalization. Varying levels of points are awarded for:

• English proficiency

• Education, with additional points for science, math, and technology

• Job offer in a high-demand field

• Work experience in the United States

• Employer endorsement

• Family ties to the United States

(Sources for above here and here.)

Punditry, politics, reaction

White House

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi

Center for American Progress

National Review

Heritage Foundation

New York Times

Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN)

National Immigration Forum

National Council of La Raza

Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund

American Civil Liberties Union

Chris Kromm

Latest Google news...

Labels:

posted by R. Neal at 10:38 AM | Email this post

Friday, May 25, 2007

Gulf Watch: Our story in Salon investigates Barbour's "Mississippi Miracle"

Since Katrina, Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour has received heaps of praise for his political savvy -- and ability to use his GOP connections to get a lion's share of federal relief funds for his state.

But with all the honors and money, how is the Mississippi recovery going? My colleague Sue Sturgis and I investigate in a special report published at Salon today.

One eye-opening item we found is just how lopsided Mississippi's take of Katrina relief has been:
Consider the Gulf Coast housing crisis, one of the key issues that has kept nearly half the population of New Orleans from returning to the city since Katrina. More than 75 percent of the housing damage from the storm was in Louisiana, but Mississippi has received 70 percent of the funds through FEMA's Alternative Housing Pilot Program. Of the $388 million available, FEMA gave a Mississippi program offering upgraded trailers more than $275 million. Meanwhile, the agency awarded Louisiana's "Katrina Cottage" program, which features more permanent modular homes for storm victims, a mere $75 million.

It's not just housing. Mississippi is also slated to get 38 percent of federal hospital recovery funds, even though it lost just 79 beds compared to 2,600 lost in southern Louisiana, which will get 45 percent of the funds. Mississippi and Louisiana both received $95 million to offset losses in higher education, even though Louisiana was home to 75 percent of displaced students. The states also received $100 million each for K-12 students affected by the storms, despite the fact that 69 percent resided in Louisiana.
Barbour insists that Congress is "getting its money's worth" for all it's given to Mississippi -- but how is the state's recovery really going?
For the residents of Hancock County, Barbour and Mississippi's ability to capture the lion's share of Katrina relief dollars makes the slow progress in their area all the more demoralizing. The county's 911 system still operates out of a trailer. Damaged wastewater and drainage systems frustrate hopes of a return to normalcy; earlier this month in Waveland, 16 miles east of Pearlington, a 9-and-a-half-foot alligator was found swimming in a drainage ditch next to a bus stop at 8 o'clock in the morning. Mayor Tommy Longo says the creatures freely roam throughout devastated residential areas.
As we point out, even worse is the fact that Barbour won't use Mississippi's recent tax windfall to help devastated coastal communities that are drowning in $79 million of debt. It's so bad, some towns are afraid they'll go bankrupt entirely:
"One thing you continually hear from officials from FEMA to the state level is that -- and they love this phrase -- they've 'never seen a city go under because of a natural disaster,'" [Waveland mayor] Longo says. "But there have been so many firsts in Katrina."

Labels: ,

posted by Chris Kromm at 1:30 PM | Email this post

Gulf Watch: Feds blame La. for housing program money crunch

Louisiana's largest state-led recovery initiative for hurricane victims -- the Road Home housing assistance program -- faces an estimated $3 billion shortfall, and federal officials yesterday told a Senate subcommittee that they have no plans to bail it out.

Convened by U.S. Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.), the hearing of the Ad Hoc Subcommittee on Disaster Recovery examined the problems facing the Road Home. Among those testifying were Federal Coordinator for Gulf Coast Rebuilding Donald Powell and Louisiana Recovery Authority Director Andy Kopplin, who offered very different explanations for the program's shortfall.

Powell blamed Louisiana for assisting wind damage victims when the program was supposed to help only those who suffered flood damage, reports the New Orleans Times-Picayune:
"We were always very clear that the federal government would not fund state housing programs to cover wind damage," he said.
Kopplin disputed the claim that the state agreed to limit the program to wind damage, saying Louisiana always intended to help residents with uncompensated storm damage, regardless of its cause.
"When the president said he would do what it takes, and stay as long as it takes, he didn't say 'except if you had wind damage,'" Kopplin said.
In many cases, the reason Road Home is paying for wind damage is because insurance companies did not -- either because homeowners lacked sufficient coverage or because the companies did not meet their obligations, according to a story that appeared in yesterday's Times-Picayune:
An LRA report says lower-than-expected insurance payouts have caused the Road Home to pay $1.3 billion that the state thought private insurers would have handled. It finds that insurance companies covered an average of 61 percent of all inspected damage, rather than the 76 percent payout rate the state expected when it set the Road Home budget. The report also finds that 37 percent of a sample of 46,223 insured Road Home applicants collected private insurance on less than half of their damage. And 11 percent got less than 10 percent of their total damage paid by insurance.
In that same article, Kopplin asked why if there was a federal directive against covering wind damage the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development approved the state's plan. Federal officials said HUD lacked the legal power to reject it.

Also testifying at yesterday's hearing were Louisiana citizens who shared personal -- and at times very emotional -- stories about their Road Home experiences. Lower 9th Ward resident Walter Thomas, a cancer patient living in a FEMA trailer, described the tortuous process he's endured in trying to get his Road Home money:
"I've called 30 or 40 times. Every time I call, someone says, 'We'll get back to you.' " But he said no one has.

"I've given up," Thomas said.
The subcommittee plans to release a report next month with findings and recommendations for improving the Road Home program.

Labels:

posted by Sue Sturgis at 1:24 PM | Email this post

Browns Ferry restart update

We reported earlier this week that TVA's Browns Ferry Unit 1 nuclear power reactor was restarted after being down more than twenty years. It was shutdown in 1985 when it was discovered that the plant's construction did not match the blueprints. Prior to that, an incident at Browns Ferry in 1975 almost resulted in a "Tennessee Valley Chernobyl" reactor meltdown.

TVA had hoped to have power from the reactor on the grid by late this week. Things didn't quite go as planned. Here's the NRC incident report:
Facility: BROWNS FERRY
Region: 2 State: AL
Unit: [1] [ ] [ ]
Notification Date: 05/24/2007
Notification Time: 04:42 [ET]
Event Date: 05/24/2007
Event Time: 02:11 [CDT]
Emergency Class: NON EMERGENCY
10 CFR Section:
50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B) - RPS ACTUATION - CRITICAL
50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A) - VALID SPECIF SYS ACTUATION

Unit SCRAM Code RX CRIT Initial PWR Initial RX Mode Current PWR Current RX Mode
1 M/R Y 3 Startup 0 Hot Shutdown

Event Text

MANUAL REACTOR SCRAM DUE TO ELECTRO-HYDRAULIC CONTROL (EHC) SYSTEM LEAK

"On 05/24/2007 at 0211 CDT Browns Ferry Unit 1 initiated a Manual reactor SCRAM due to an Electro-Hydraulic Control (EHC) System pressure lowering and reservoir level lowering due to an EHC system leak. The leak was from #6 Main Turbine Combined Intermediate Valve (CIV). All Systems responded as required to the manual SCRAM signal. No Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) initiations occurred as a result of the manual SCRAM signal. Reactor water level was maintained in the normal band during the SCRAM. There were no Primary Containment Isolation signals received during the SCRAM. The EHC leak was stopped due to reservoir level depletion and EHC pumps being secured. There were no indications of main steam relief valves (MSRVs) opening. Reactor pressure is being controlled using Main Steam Line Drains. Reactor Level is being maintained in band using Control Rod Drive pumps. Repair of the EHC leak is in progress."

The Scram was characterized as uncomplicated. All rods fully inserted. The only significant equipment out of service at the time was RCIC. When the leak was initially discovered, it was about 60 drops per minute. When repairs were attempted, the piping separated and approximately 600 gallons of EHC fluid was discharged out the break onto the turbine building floor. Cleanup of the EHC fluid is in progress and environmental monitoring is in place to assure no offsite release of the spill.

The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector.
SCRAM means "The sudden shutting down of a nuclear reactor, usually by rapid insertion of control rods, either automatically or manually by the reactor operator. May also be called a reactor trip. It is actually an acronym for 'safety control rod axe man,' the worker assigned to insert the emergency rod on the first reactor (the Chicago Pile) in the U.S." (source).

A local news report says two workers were sprayed with the EHC fluid, which is "slightly corrosive but not radioactive," and were taken to a local hospital as a precaution. They were released yesterday afternoon.

According to the article, TVA officials said it was "not a safety problem." A nuclear safety expert with the Union of Concerned Scientists said "It's not until you pressurize the system that you'll find the leaks."

Maybe so. But as we reported here earlier, in April of 2004 the NRC served TVA with notice of a Severity Level III violation at Browns Ferry involving improper welds in the reactor "torus" (a suppression chamber surrounding the reactor as part of its containment system).

In their notice of violation, the NRC says:
Based on the information developed during the inspection, and the information presented at the conference, the NRC has determined that a violation of NRC requirements occurred. The violation is cited in the enclosed Notice of Violation (Notice), and the circumstances surrounding it are described in detail in the subject inspection report. The violation involves four examples of a failure to adhere to the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V. All four examples were associated with the BF1 Long-Term Torus Integrity Program, and involved: failure to evaluate or incorporate numerous deficient welds into Deficiency Fix Requests sketches; failure to perform numerous repairs on the correct welds; omission of numerous welds requiring repair from Work Orders, and failure of Quality Control (QC) to independently verify the correct location of numerous weld repairs. At the conference, TVA acknowledged the errors, discussed its root cause and extent of condition reviews, and corrective actions.
Given that TVA's Browns Ferry restart has been under intense NRC scrutiny because of past problems there, "It's not until you pressurize the system that you'll find the leaks" (similar to what we used to call the "smoke test" in computers and electronics - plug it in and see if it smokes) may not be the best safety and quality control methodology.

Labels:

posted by R. Neal at 9:51 AM | Email this post

Thursday, May 24, 2007

Gulf Watch: New book investigates Katrina disaster

With federal scientists this week announcing that they expect this year's hurricane season to be unusually intense, many Americans are wondering whether New Orleans -- one of the places that bore the brunt of Hurricane Katrina's devastation in 2005 -- is ready for what may lie ahead.

For answers, they might turn to a new book from the Center for Public Integrity, a Washington-based nonprofit that produces investigative journalism in the public interest.

For City Adrift: New Orleans Before and After Hurricane Katrina, the Center commissioned seven authors to investigate the storm's aftermath in the Big Easy and to find out what should happen now to prevent a similar catastrophe in the future. Contributors include Pulitzer Prize-winner John McQuaid, whose work predicted the levee failures; longtime Boston Globe reporter and Gulf coast resident Curtis Wilkie, who examines New Orleans' leadership crisis; and Katy Reckdahl, whose reporting on the housing problems facing the city's musicians was included in the Institute's own one-year report on Katrina. Renowned broadcast journalist Dan Rather wrote the book's foreword.

"Katrina remains one of the worst catastrophes in American history," says Bill Buzenberg, the Center's executive director. "The fact that more than a year and a half later a major city such as New Orleans is still struggling to repair itself is untenable, and must be called to account."

For more details about the book, biographies of the contributors, and information on ordering a copy, click here.

Labels:

posted by Sue Sturgis at 4:31 PM | Email this post

Remembering Rosa Parks, and some who would rather not

Last week, the Tennessee General Assembly passed the "Rosa Parks Act", which "expunges public records of persons charged with a misdemeanor or felony while challenging a law designed to maintain racial segregation or discrimination."

In other words, the bill grants blanket pardon and expunges all records for civil rights pioneers who stood up (or in the case of Rosa Parks sat down) for their rights and were charged or convicted of a crime.

Alabama passed a similar law last year. The bill made Rosa Parks eligible for a pardon, and the bill's sponsor said he would contact her estate to see if they want to apply.

Laws in both states allow for preservation of historical records on exhibit at museums, and Tennessee's law allows for a petitioner to receive a pardon but have their records preserved for historical purposes.

Florida legislators proposed a similar bill this year, but it died in committee. Sponsors say they will reintroduce the Florida bill next year.

Along the way, the Tennessee bill was amended to exclude serious felonies (at least the way I read it) and include a requirement that the arrest and conviction had to occur more than 37 years ago and that no other convictions have occurred since. The bill passed unanimously in the Tennessee Senate, and by 88 to 6 in the Tennessee House of Representatives.

Yes, that's right. Six Tennessee State Representatives voted against it. They were: Rep. Kevin Brooks, R-Cleveland; Rep. Stacey Campfield, R-Knoxville; Rep. Chris Crider, R-Milan, Rep. Bill Dunn, R-Knoxville; Rep. Joey Hensley, R-Hohenwald; and Rep. Donna Rowland, R-Murfreesboro.

You may recall that Rep. Stacey Campfield had previously gained national attention twice, once for complaining about not being allowed to join the Black Caucus (Campfield is white), and again for introducing legislation that would require the state to issue death certificates for every abortion (so, if I recall correctly, we could know who is having abortions because death certificates are public record unlike medical records).

A columnist for the Nashville Tennessean contacted some of the six to ask why they voted against the bill. Reps. Hensley, Dunn, and Campfield expressed concerns about pardoning convicted felons, with Hensley saying "I hated to arbitrarily expunge all felonies." Apparently he didn't read the final version of the bill. Campfield also expressed concerns about pardoning members of violent organizations such as the Black Panthers.

Anyway, this legislation is a fitting tribute to those who put their life and liberty on the line for the civil rights movement. Hopefully we will see the spread of more Rosa Parks Acts around the South.

Labels: ,

posted by R. Neal at 2:48 PM | Email this post

NC Leg: Don't bully kids at school, just paddle them

As the North Carolina legislature scurries to meet its "cross-over" deadline today, a slew of new legislation is being passed in haste -- with often confusing results.

Case in point: Votes in the N.C. House yesterday concerning school kids. On one hand, the lower chamber approved an "anti-bullying" measure, even defeating a late bid by conservatives to remove gay students from the list of those who shouldn't be harassed.

On the other hand, the House also shot down a bill that would have banned schools from paddling students and using other forms of corporal punishment. The Raleigh News & Observer reports:
Children and schools were the subject of several bills in the House, including one against bullying and student harassment that the House tentatively approved Wednesday and planned a final vote Thursday. The chamber rejected by one vote an amendment that would have removed an entire list of characteristics of potential victims, including sexual orientation.

The list is needed "because we know those people are far more likely to be the victims of bullying," said Rep. Rick Glazier, D-Cumberland, before it was approved by a vote of 72-45.

But the House voted 50-66 against a measure that would have eliminated the right of school districts to adopt policies permitting physical punishment of a student.

"If you're not a strong disciplinarian you're doing something very bad for children," said Rep. John Blust, R-Guilford, a bill opponent.
That's an interesting message about protecting school kids from harm: Kids, don't taunt your fellow students. But teachers, whip the kids if you must.

(Note: Every industrialized country in the world prohibits corporal punishment except the U.S., Canada and one state in Australia.)

Labels:

posted by Chris Kromm at 11:46 AM | Email this post

Why should you go to the U.S. Social Forum?

This summer, a historic gathering will take place in Atlanta: the U.S. Social Forum. Part of the World Social Forum movement, the U.S. forum aims to bring 20,000 activists together to build a new movement for change. Below, Alice Lovelace -- a long-time organizer and poet in Atlanta, and national organizer for the gathering -- tells why the forum is so important in the wake of Katrina, and why you should go to the U.S. Social Forum June 27 - July 1. - Ed.

Katrina, the U.S. Social Forum, and a new movement for change

by Alice Lovelace

Catastrophic events act merely as wake up calls, opportunities to seriously step up and do something that is going to make a difference. The smallest act of resistance and each gesture towards the alleviation of the suffering of others, whether on the Gulf Coast or elsewhere, is a step toward our own emancipation.

Considering the condition of the world today, it is past time to answer the call and rise to the occasion. The United States Social Forum represents an opportunity for individuals, organizations, and institutions committed to radical progressive change to rise in opposition to white supremacy and the ideology of manifest destiny.

Katrina: A catalyst for change?

Katrina was more than a hurricane. Katrina was a political “a-ha” moment that sent ripples throughout the social change movements, this government, and people observing around the globe.


For the social justice movements, Katrina made it clear that we were not organized enough, nor strong enough to offer front line assistance to the grassroots communities most impacted by the natural and manmade disaster.

For this nation, government neglect and ineptitude became transparent as we watched desperate people beg for rescue, for food, water … any type of assistance. Meanwhile, Republican opportunism, cronyism, and greed were blatant as evidenced by the naming of Halliburton as a no-bid contractor to clean up a devastated New Orleans. This was done even as they were under investigation for fraudulent billing and mismanagement of millions of tax dollars while performing some of the same tasks in Iraq.

For people across the globe, Katrina revealed the soft underbelly of the beast. We saw television news coverage that stood in stark contrast to the standard programming that normally presents the United States as the land of the rich. Instead, people watched in horror as the institutionalized nature of USA racism and classism was revealed, and shown to be alive and thriving in the waters of Katrina.

It is important that we understand we are all living our own personal, social, and political Katrina's.

The U.S. Social Forum: In the beginning ...

According to Michael Leon Guerrero, who is emerging as the U.S. Social Forum historian, it all began in June 2003 at a meeting of the WSF International Council (IC) when Grassroots Global Justice Alliance (GGJ) decided to begin the discussion among USA organizations about a U. S. Social Forum. Two meetings were convened in 2004 to begin the discussions around policy, advocacy, and solidarity among the groups who agreed to support the gathering.

Some of the objectives set were to be intentional in outreach to grassroots groups working in communities of color and representing working class people, and in figuring out how to make this gathering a part of movement building. In 2005, to acknowledge the impact that social and political struggle in the South have had on this nation, Atlanta was selected as the site for this historic gathering.

Why should people come?

The most compelling reason I know to attend this social forum is to raise your consciousness about the diverse social and economic movements in this country, so as to better see the world through a frame of social activism.

We live in a world where corporations are afforded more privileges than people. We live in a world where the cry for corporate globalism hides the destruction that runaway capitalism visits on the poor and landless masses. Even working class people and most of the middle class are negatively impacted by this move to force poor and struggling countries to open their markets to corporate capital, often at the risk of forcing homegrown businesses to close, farmers to abandon their land, and pushing more and more people into poverty.

Another reason to attend is to network, dialogue, share a meal, commune, and reason with people who would normally not be in your circle or on your radar. Organizations involved include CARE and Amnesty International, labor unions like AFL-CIO and Jobs with Justice, and grassroots organizations like Chinese Progressive Association and the Coalition of Immokalee Workers.

20,000 organizers and activist from across this country and around the world in one place for you to learn from and share with -- that has to be tempting.

How will one benefit?

The USSF represents a rare opportunity to gather with others from outside our normal circle of usual suspects. Instead of being among folks who tend to all think like us, we will be with people from every ethnic group in this country, working on every conceivable issue, some who view the world and the work/worth very differently from us.

It is exciting to be among people who will possibly challenge us to make our work relevant to the local, regional, global world beyond our world.

How Will One's Community Benefit?

When we grow as organizers we bring a larger sense of community and connection to each other and global movements. We understand better how we can connect to serious issues as we work with others working for social change. Organizers and cultural workers can gain an integrated sense of self as part of an historical movement in this nation for social change. The U.S. Social Forum offers us an opportunity to deepen our interconnectedness as a community.

By posing questions, conducting workshops, offering arts based dialogue, and sharing our process and stories, we have the opportunity to be in community with organizers who seek a deeper understanding of the role art can play in creating community and moving people to embrace change.

Making another world possible?

The final day of the U.S. Social Forum will include an assembly of social movements in the United States. Through this process we plan to collect a calendar of activism that will let us support each other's work at a national level. We will demonstrate how our issues all intersect. Hopefully, people will be inspired to strengthen our social and political connections, and campaigns.

In 2008 there will not be a World Social Forum, so the IC has called for a series of global days of action. This offers an opportunity to create integrated, powerful actions that demonstrate to this country and the world that we are united with each other and with other global movements as we work towards an end to persistent poverty and homelessness, for a livable wage, for free and secure sources of water, for protection of the environment, to reform the criminal and juvenile justice systems, and make forward movement around the countless other issues that represent ways people and groups are working to create another world.

18 months before America elects another U.S. President people are asking if the forum is a springboard into strong political activism. Will it inspire us to create a third party? Will it energize communities to ask harder questions of those running for electoral offices? Will we learn strategies for holding these people accountable to our communities and our needs?

What is possible following the U.S. Social Forum is dependant on the level of commitment and participation people and groups invest in the social forum process. This is the world's largest open space; a gathering of civil society to educate each other, share our visions and create strategy for true and lasting change.

If another world is possible, another United States is necessary!

A longer version of this story originally appeared in InMotion magazine.

Labels:

posted by Chris Kromm at 10:56 AM | Email this post

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

Gulf Watch: House OKs affordable housing fund for Gulf Coast

Help could be on its way to hurricane-stricken areas of Louisiana and Mississippi thanks to legislation passed yesterday by the U.S. House of Representatives toughening oversight of scandal-wracked home mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

That's because the measure would also create an affordable housing fund to help rebuild storm-ravaged communities.

The Federal Housing Finance Reform Act would take 1.2 percent of the portfolio value of the government-sponsored mortgage companies and put it into a fund for the construction and rehabilitation of affordable housing. The money would then go to the states, which would be responsible for allocating it to housing providers. In the first year of the fund's five-year life span, all of the money -- expected to be about $500 million -- would go to hurricane-afflicted areas of Louisiana and Mississippi.

Louisiana, which suffered 80 percent of the storm damage, would get 75 percent of the money. That represents more proportionate funding than was offered by some other programs designed to address storm victims' housing needs. For example, the Federal Emergency Management Agency recently awarded 70 percent of its Alternative Housing Pilot Program grants to Mississippi, even though that state suffered less than 25 percent of the housing loss caused by Katrina.

A lack of affordable housing remains one of the biggest barriers to Gulf Coast recovery. In fact, a post-Katrina status report released last month by the Albany, N.Y.-based Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government and the Public Affairs Research Council of Louisiana concluded that it represented the most pressing problem facing reconstruction:
By far, the one issue that dominates the recovery effort is housing -- that is, the lack of it. In all of the hard-hit areas -- even those where economies seem to be mending -- the problem of affordable housing continues to defy resolution. Many efforts now underway are the result of nonprofit and volunteer groups, and some developers willing to take a risk. But what is under construction or in the planning stages now is not nearly enough to meet the demand. Thousands remain in FEMA trailers across Louisiana and Mississippi, while thousands more are on the streets.
Though the bill -- whose primary sponsor was Financial Services Committee Chair Barney Frank (D-Mass.) -- ultimately passed the House in a bipartisan 313-104 vote, it still generated considerable controversy, the New Orleans Times-Picayune reports:
With a sizable chunk of money in play, there were many hands grabbing at it. Rep. Kevin Brady, R-Texas, tried unsuccessfully to steer 10 percent of the money to his state, and Rep. Eric Cantor, R-Va., sought to spread it among all of the states that have suffered natural disasters. He too failed.

Rep. Spencer Bachus, R-Ala., said the House had spent enough recently on hurricane-damaged states.

"This bill creates $3 billion, much of which will go to Katrina. Well, it was only two months ago that we appropriated $3 billion for Katrina," Bachus said. "We didn't need $6 billion; we needed $3 billion."

The conservative Republican Study Committee took particular aim at the bill's affordable-housing fund. One member suggested it was tantamount to "socialism" to snatch profits from private corporations, and the group's briefing materials called it a "tax on consumers."
To call Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac "private" corporations and leave it at that is rather misleading. In fact, the companies are what are known as "government-sponsored enterprises": While privately owned and operated by shareholders, they are protected financially by the federal government. They enjoy access to a line of credit through the U.S. Treasury, exemptions from state and local income taxes, and freedom from certain Securities and Exchange Commission registration requirements.

What especially bothers the RSC, led by Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas), is the fact that the grant funds could be provided to organizations whose politics it finds objectionable. In a list of talking points issued on the measure, the group charges that these grant recipients could ultimately use the funds for political activities -- even though acknowledging that the bill expressly disallows that:
While the bill does prohibit the use of these grant funds for political activities, advocacy, lobbying, etc., many conservatives in the past have expressed concerns that the Fund could still be used by liberal entities to displace other funds. Money is fungible, so that if a group cannot use Fund grants for political activities, it could certainly have more money freed up for political activities because of the injection of Fund grants.
The RSC points out that the largest organizations working on affordable housing issues include ACORN, the National Council of La Raza and Housing Works -- all of whom it criticizes for "partisan, liberal political activities." ACORN, it charges, "led voter registration efforts against Republicans, with allegations of voter fraud in Florida, Ohio, and North Carolina." The group is the nation's largest community-based organization representing low- and moderate-income people.

But what RSC does not mention is that the allegations against ACORN were just that: allegations. Three lawsuits brought against the organization for voter fraud in the wake of the 2004 election were all dismissed, while criminal investigations of voter fraud claims ended in Colorado, Wisconsin, Florida, and Ohio after authorities found no evidence of any pervasive fraud or wrongdoing by ACORN. In fact, a federal judge in South Florida ruled that some of the accusations made against the group were so baseless that they amounted to defamation, according to the St. Petersburg Times.

In order to shore up its case against ACORN, RSC trots out a report on the organization from the Employment Policies Institute. But it does not mention that EPI is a front group created by Berman and Company, a Washington public-affairs firm owned by Rick Berman, who lobbies for the restaurant and hotel industries, according to the Center for Media & Democracy's Sourcewatch project:
EPI, registered as a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization, has has been widely quoted in news stories regarding minimum wage issues, and although a few of those stories have correctly described it as a "think tank financed by business," most stories fail to provide any identification that would enable readers to identify the vested interests behind its pronouncements. Instead, it is usually described exactly the way it describes itself, as a "non-profit research organization dedicated to studying public policy issues surrounding employment growth" that "focuses on issues that affect entry-level employment." In reality, EPI's mission is to keep the minimum wage low so Berman's clients can continue to pay their workers as little as possible.
Given that ACORN is an outspoken advocate for a living wage, it's no wonder EPI and its RSC allies would seek to discredit the group.

Fortunately, RSC's talking points did not stop the House from passing this much-needed legislation. However, the bill now goes to the Senate -- which, as the Times-Picayune points, out "has failed to act on a raft of House-passed hurricane-recovery measures since January."

Labels:

posted by Sue Sturgis at 2:41 PM | Email this post

Who said this?

A fascinating quote about U.S. media, from a surprising source:
The American press is overwhelmingly owned and operated by Republicans who fix the rules of U.S. political debate. And I use the words "fix" advisedly.

It is a press that has generally grown comfortable, fat and self-righteous; and which with some noteworthy exceptions voices the prejudices and preconceptions of entrenched wealth rather than those qualities of critical inquiry and rebellious spirits we associated with our noblest journalistic traditions.

It is a press that is generally more concerned with the tax privileges of any fat cat than with the care and feeding of any underdog.

It is a press that sanctimoniously boasts of its independence and means by that its right to do what its Republican owners damn please.

The press used to be regarded as a public trust, not a private playground.
Who said that? Michael Moore? Noam Chomsky? Hugo Chavez? Find out after the jump ...

That illuminating quote was made 50 years ago by James Wechsler, editor of The New York Post.

Hard to think of a time when the Post -- or most of our country's major media -- were considered part of a "journalistic tradition" marked by "critical inquiry and rebellious spirit."

The quote is from an address Wechsler delivered in 1957, cited in J.E. Gerald's useful book The Social Responsibility of the Press (1963).

Here's another interesting quotable from the 1950s, this one from Robert Hutchins in his book Freedom, Education and the Fund (1956):
Of course we have a one-party press n this country, and we shall have one as long as the press is big business, and as long as people with money continue to feel safer on the Republican side.

Labels:

posted by Chris Kromm at 1:07 PM | Email this post

Nuclear news update

Sue’s post regarding nuclear waste in the South suggests a clearer picture of the real purpose behind a proposed new interstate highway.

As we mentioned here last year, the controversial $50 billion, 450 mile I-3 would run from the Knoxville/Oak Ridge area to Savannah, making its way through wild, undeveloped Appalachian Mountains in North Georgia, Tennessee, and North Carolina, skirting the Great Smoky Mountains National Park.

In addition to environmental concerns, opponents of the project also suggested a hidden nuclear agenda.
The politicians proposing "Interstate 3" tout it as a connection between the port of Savannah, Georgia and the numerous interstates running through Knoxville, Tennessee with connections to the industrial Midwest.

However, a glance at the map of the proposed route shows that I-3 would go right by the massive Savannah River Site (SRS) nuclear complex in South Carolina across from Augusta, Georgia and would terminate, not in Knoxville itself, but at the recently completed I-140 spur running from Maryville-Alcoa to the nuclear facilities at Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

While rarely mentioned by I-3 proponents, it is likely that this nuclear connection is a key reason why this interstate project is being proposed. The nuclear weapons complex, composed of widely dispersed sites throughout the West and the Southeast, has for years depended on transporting dangerous radioactive materials, including plutonium and tritium, on our highways. The new nuclear weapons complex being planned will have production facilities concentrated at Oak Ridge, TN, Watts Bar, TN, Savannah River Site, SC, and the Pantex facility in Amarillo, Texas.

[..]

Some specific examples of the traffic in deadly materials which now take place on I-26 and I-40 and would likely be shifted to I-3 if it is built:

• Weapons grade plutonium moves from Amarillo, Texas to SRS on unmarked trucks. At SRS, the plutonium will be worked over and then re-shipped, if the current proposals move forward. Destinations include Duke Power nuclear plants in NC and SC (experimental MOX plutonium fuel) and the Oak Ridge Y-12 Nuclear Weapons Plant (plutonium "pits", the triggers for nuclear bombs).

• Rods used to produce tritium, which is used for hydrogen bombs, are being shipped from the Watts Bar reactor in Tennessee to the Savannah River Site where the rods will be processed to produce tritium gas. The gas will then be shipped back to Oak Ridge in trucks.

• High level radioactive waste from commercial reactors is likely to be shipped along Interstate 3 to the Savannah River Site.

• So-called low level radioactive waste is trafficked both to Oak Ridge and SRS.
In other nuclear news, TVA restarted Unit 1 at the Browns Ferry Nuclear Power Plant yesterday. The restart marks the first commercial nuclear power reactor startup in the U.S. since 1996.

As we mentioned here recently, the reactor was shutdown in 1985 when it was discovered that the plant's construction did not match the blueprints. Prior to that, an incident at Browns Ferry in 1975 almost resulted in a "Tennessee Valley Chernobyl" reactor meltdown.

Labels: ,

posted by R. Neal at 6:04 AM | Email this post

Tuesday, May 22, 2007

'Mobile Chernobyl' Southbound?

The Bush administration's plans for creating an international partnership to reprocess spent nuclear fuel could result in large quantities of radioactive waste being hauled through Southern communities via truck, train or ship.

So reveals a set of maps unveiled today by community groups working with the Nuclear Information and Resource Service, a national nuclear watchdog group with offices in suburban Washington and Asheville, N.C. The maps show possible transportation routes that high-level radioactive waste would take from nuclear power reactors to South Carolina's Savannah River site, a federal nuclear processing center located near Augusta, Ga. (The map at left shows potential road routes; click on it for a larger image.)

The U.S. Department of Energy is currently considering the Savannah site and 10 others across the nation for a project known as the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership, which promotes nukes as the economical answer to the nation's energy and climate woes -- a claim that numerous experts have challenged. GNEP locations being considered in the South also include Barnwell, S.C.; East Tennessee; and Paducah, Ky.; other possible sites are located in Illinois, Ohio, Washington, and two each in Idaho and New Mexico.

The GNEP would redirect planned transport of the nation's commercial reactor waste from the controversial Yucca Mountain site in Nevada. Reactors currently store their waste on site. In all, GNEP would move radioactive waste from 75 sites in 33 states.

John Sticpewich created the maps using DOE data for NIRS' Asheville-based Common Sense at the Nuclear Crossroads campaign as part of a report on problems with transport and reprocessing of nuclear waste in the Carolinas. Due to limited resources, the new maps show only those waste sites east of the Mississippi River and from the Carolinas northward.

"Credit analysts on Wall Street have suggested that moving the accumulated high-level waste from the reactor sites would make investment in new nuclear power more likely," says Sticpewich. "This report documents the huge tonnage of radioactive waste that must be dealt with, the very high costs of transporting it, and the potential for impact that such a move would have on hundreds of communities along the way."

NIRS coined the term "Mobile Chernobyl" when Congress was considering shipping highly radioactive waste to Nevada in order to evoke the specter of disasters like the 1986 catastrophe in the Ukraine. NIRS also points to the potential risk of terror attacks on waste shipments at the very time the nuclear industry is pushing for a dramatic expansion.

"There are 32 new reactors moving forward, and of these 30 are in the South," says Mary Olson of NIRS' Asheville office. "Now if GNEP goes forward, more of the real cost of those new nuclear power reactors will be clear: Nuclear waste would stay here in the South and more would come from all over the country -- and possibly the world."

Labels: , ,

posted by Sue Sturgis at 3:59 PM | Email this post

Monday, May 21, 2007

Florida shakes up Election 2008

It's official: Florida's bid to shake up the 2008 elections -- which we first reported on in March -- is now reality.

Today, Republican Gov. Charlie Crist signed into law a bill that moves Florida's presidential primary ahead of February's "Super Tuesday," drastically altering the road candidates must take to get nominated. As Stateline.org reports:
Florida Gov. Charlie Crist (R) fired the starting gun that could set off another mad dash of states jostling for early dates to choose nominees for the White House.

Crist May 21 signed the Florida Legislature’s plan to move up the Sunshine State’s 2008 presidential primary to Jan. 29, leapfrogging a critical mass of states gravitating to primaries on what’s becoming known as “Super-Duper Tuesday” on Feb. 5.
If the current lineup holds, only Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire and Wyoming would have earlier primaries than Florida -- although Stateline reports t