PO Box 531  •  Durham,NC 27702  •  Telephone: (919) 419-8311  •  Fax: (919) 419-8315

Friday, December 30, 2005

Friday Bird Blogging



Tricolored Heron
posted by R. Neal at 8:34 AM | Email this post

Sunday, December 25, 2005

Feliz Navidad!

Holiday greetings, y'all. Blogging will be extra light over the next week as Facing South takes some much-needed R&R. See you in the New Year!
posted by Chris Kromm at 5:10 AM | Email this post

Friday, December 23, 2005

Friday Bird Blogging

posted by R. Neal at 9:56 AM | Email this post

Thursday, December 22, 2005

President Bush pardons two Tennessee moonshiners

Posted by R. Neal

No, seriously. One of the former moonshiners said he was surprised by the pardon but that he's looking forward to voting and buying a gun. The other said he could "almost be a Republican" after receiving the pardon from Bush.
posted by R. Neal at 5:35 AM | Email this post

Reconstruction News Network

Posted by the Faux News Corp. under contract
with the U.S. Department of Homeland Informations


WE INTERRUPT THIS BLOG FOR AN IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT...

It has come to our attention that the Institute for Southern Studies is going to great lengths to present a biased picture of your government's response to the recent unpleasantness on the Gulf Coast and all the progress we are making there.

We're here to set the record straight by bringing you unbiased, unfiltered news about the recovery and reconstruction effort so you can see for yourself how America working together can spread freedom, democracy, and beignets in the Gulf.

Click "there's more" for a sampling of the fair and balanced reporting we're working on…

Item: FEMA is still doing a heckuva job! They've setup a website where victims and evacuees can use their laptop computers and wi-fi internet connections to see if they qualify to apply for an application for consideration for possible future relief. They've setup a call center where operators are standing by to offer sympathy. They're stimulating the economy by handing out billions in no-bid contracts to experienced government contractors, avoiding red tape and passing the savings on to American taxpayers. FEMA: we're from the government and we're here to help!

Item: The cleanup is going great! The EPA has determined that, while elevated, residual levels of Benzo (a) pyrene, Arsenic, Barium, Cadmium, Chromium, Lead, Benzene, Chlorobenzene, Toluene and Carbon Disulfide in the sludge covering the 9th Ward do not pose a risk of immediate death as long as protective equipment and clothing are used to minimize exposure. This is great news for returning residents!

Item: We're rebuilding schools in New Orleans! After only three months, the first school has reopened. One school is, what, 1000% percent more schools than no schools? Or maybe it's infinity percent more schools. We're not too good at that math and science stuff, but we're pretty sure one school is some rather large or even imaginary number more than zero schools, percentage-wise. No child will be left behind!

Item: Free and fair elections will be held in New Orleans! Although February's local elections have been canceled, election officials are on track to hold elections at some future point, probably by November 2006. With most Democrats former voters now relocated to other areas of the country, election officials expect few lines and no problems. Let freedom rain!

OK, then.
posted by R. Neal at 5:25 AM | Email this post

Senate approves hurricane relief funds

Posted by R. Neal

The Senate approved $29 billion in hurricane relief funds:
Nearly four months after the maelstrom devastated New Orleans and much of the nearby Gulf Coast, the House was expected to vote Thursday on a final defense bill containing the storm assistance. The aid is mostly for reconstructing damaged buildings and aiding battered businesses and homeowners.

The Senate approved the measure 93-0 Wednesday night after the aid became entangled with — and then finally disengaged from — a fight over an unrelated effort to open oil drilling in an Alaska wildlife refuge.

[..]

The $29 billion aid package is the result of two weeks of negotiating among lawmakers to nearly double Bush's initial funding request.

It includes:

  • $11.5 billion in Community Development Block Grants to spur economic development and help homeowners without flood insurance rebuild or repair their homes.

  • $4.4 billion for storm-related Defense Department expenses and facility damage.

  • $2.9 billion for the Army Corps of Engineers to continue storm and flood repairs, begin reconstructing levees and accelerate studies on improving Gulf Coast flood protection.

  • $2.8 billion to repair damaged roads, bridges and other transportation infrastructure.

  • $1.6 billion for education, including $645 million for schools that took in students, $750 million for schools affected by the hurricanes and $200 million for higher education.

  • $400 million for farmers and forests in Katrina disaster areas.
  • This is great news for residents of the Gulf region.

    The vote was not without some last-minute drama related to the ANWR drilling issue that Chris mentioned here Monday:
    It was a huge victory for environmentalists and Senate Democrats who argued that drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge would jeopardize the wild ecosystem that characterizes the refuge's coastal plain where polar bears, caribou, migratory birds and other wildlife thrive.

    Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, who has fought unsuccessfully for a quarter-century to open the plain to oil drilling, had hoped to garner enough votes to overcome a threatened filibuster by attaching the measure to the defense bill that included tens of billions of dollars for troops in Iraq and for victims of Hurricane Katrina.

    Instead, Stevens found himself a few votes shy of getting his wish.

    "This has been the saddest day of my life," Stevens said.

    Sen. Maria Cantwell, R-Wash., an ardent defender of the refuge who led anti-drilling forces during the Senate debate, called Stevens' tactic "legislative blackmail" and "trickery" that united Democrats on the issue.

    Republican leaders fell three votes short of the 60 votes needed to break the filibuster threat and advance the defense spending bill to a final vote, forcing GOP leaders to temporarily withdraw the bill and take out the drilling provision.
    So that's some more good news. Of course, the Bush administration never passes up an opportunity for another tax cut:
    President Bush on Wednesday signed legislation that provides $8.7 billion in tax breaks over 10 years for Gulf Coast businesses, a measure he said is part of the government's plan to help the region rebuild from destructive hurricanes.

    [..]

    The measure, known as the Gulf Opportunity Zone Act of 2005, sets up a special enterprise zone in the coastal area where businesses and jobs were destroyed following the Aug. 29 storm.

    The tax breaks for business investment are aimed at luring companies into the region and keeping those that are already there. Companies can use a tax credit to defray salaries if they kept employees on the payroll even while shut down due to storm damage.
    There are also tax breaks for rebuilding infrastructure, rehabilitating buildings, and building low-income housing, and for rehabilitating toxic "brownfields". These sound like tax cuts that may actually be beneficial for a change.

    Sadly, though, somebody's gotta pay:
    Vice President Dick Cheney cast a tie-breaking vote in the Senate on Wednesday to seal the deal on a $39.7 billion deficit-reduction package.

    Five moderate Republicans broke ranks, joining 44 Democrats and an independent to oppose the first entitlement-spending growth cuts in nearly a decade.

    Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine, among the five GOP holdouts, called the bill "a cynical piece of legislation that punishes our most vulnerable citizens."

    [..]

    The bill trims growth in Medicaid spending $4.8 billion and Medicare by $6.4 billion over five years. It also cuts $12.6 billion from student loan programs.
    But wait, there's more:
    The U.S. Senate on Wednesday passed a $602 billion bill that cuts funds for health, education and labor programs on the same day the Senate approved two separate rounds of cuts to health care programs for the poor.

    By voice vote, the Senate approved the fiscal 2006 spending bill for the Health and Human Services, Labor and Education departments.

    [..]

    Some high-profile programs would suffer spending cuts in the labor, health and education bill, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the "No Child Left Behind" education program that had been a priority of President George W. Bush.

    Job training programs also would be cut, as well as children's health and Head Start preschool programs for poor children.
    So, it's OK to run up hundreds of billions in deficits to help the people of Iraq (and Halliburton), but we have to make some sacrifices to help the victims of Katrina, "we" being children, old people, sick people, and the working poor.

    OK, then.
    posted by R. Neal at 5:20 AM | Email this post

    Wednesday, December 21, 2005

    Why did people die in New Orleans?

    In case you missed it, one of the more astounding moments in last week's Congressional hearings about Hurricane Katrina was seeing a series of Republican lawmakers claim that Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Blanco was personally responsible for the 1,086 known to have died in the storm.

    The NOLA Times-Picayune relates this gem from last week:
    Some members of the House Select Committee, which is ostensibly investigating the federal government's response to the crisis in the New Orleans area, insisted that Mayor Ray Nagin and Gov. Kathleen Blanco accept personal responsibility for the people who died.

    U.S. Rep Jeff Miller, R-Fla., giving himself over wholly to demagoguery, told Blanco that the 1,086 Louisiana residents known to have died in the storm are about half the number of American lives lost in Iraq.

    "You lost that many in one day," he said.
    SHE lost that many? In the entire hearings -- a complete white-wash aside from one fiesty panel of African-American survivors -- I didn't hear one Democrat personally accuse President Bush of causing over 1,000 deaths in New Orleans. The could have made the case. As the NOLA columnist says:
    Is [Miller] so committed to partisan gamesmanship that he's willing to put Blanco's failings on par with the crumbling of the federal government's floodwalls?
    And under-funded levee repair would be just the start of Washington's failures in the Gulf, right up to the GOP's obscene plan this week to make hurricane aid dependent on approval of drilling in the Alaskan wildlife refuge. Do they really care so little about the people of the Gulf to tie it up with one of Congress' most politically-charged votes this year?

    Republicans have pushed hard -- and the media and Democrats have gone along -- in making a big deal about evacuation orders: when they were made, did people listen to them, and so on.

    But that's not the issue. Some people hear evacuation orders, some don't. Some are able to respond to them, some can't. It's particularly pointless when talking about Hurricane Katrina, which as late as Friday -- two days before the hurricane made landfall -- was a mild-mannered storm aiming for Apalachicola, Florida.

    Most importantly, in interview after interview with families of those who died, it becomes clear that many stayed by choice (a fact that busts some myths on the left) because they thought the levees would hold. They knew about all the recent construction project on the levees -- wouldn't that make them safe?

    In my trip to New Orleans a week ago, I saw first-hand why these "rebuilt" levees failed. Thanks to Washington budget cuts, they were done on the cheap -- not driving the piles deep enough, using wobbly "I" beams instead of walls with a broad base, etc.

    This makes the Republican assault on Louisiana's local leaders all the more offensive -- and is distracting many, including progressives, from the real issues. As the NOLA editorial concludes:
    Nagin and Blanco have both made notable mistakes since this crisis began, but it is dishonest and mean-spirited of Congress to suggest that mistakes made by either one makes them liable for nearly 1,100 lives.

    Maybe a small percentage of those who perished would still be alive if Nagin and Blanco had worked together to provide transportation.

    But if the federal government's floodwalls had held, it's doubtful anybody would have died at all.
    Let's not forget it.
    posted by Chris Kromm at 7:02 AM | Email this post

    Tuesday, December 20, 2005

    Looting Homeland Security

    Posted by R. Neal

    Here's a great article in this week's Rolling Stone:
    Natural disasters have a way of exposing the cracks in the foundation of our civilization -- the scary things that we all suspect to be just under the surface, but that, in ordinary times, we would prefer not to think about. The sudden visibility of poverty in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina laid waste to the city is the most vivid example of this effect. So, too, is the fact -- now plain for all to see -- that the Department of Homeland Security, the arm of the federal government responsible for ensuring our safety in times of national emergency, has become little more than an arm of big business, a radical experiment in President Bush's brand of market-based government.
    The report delves deeply into the incompetence, cronyism, and corruption of the Bush administration's Department of Homeland Security, with some interesting observations on the history and current state of FEMA.
    posted by R. Neal at 7:14 AM | Email this post

    Top Ten East Tennesseans

    Posted by R. Neal

    The local paper asked readers to vote for the top ten East Tennesseans. They came up with a pretty impressive list. Here are the results:

    1. Dolly Parton: "It costs a lot of money to look this cheap!"

    2. Sgt. Alvin C. York: Pacifist WWI hero, immortalized by Gary Cooper

    3. David Crockett: "Kilt him a b'ar when he was only three", died at the Alamo

    4. Pat Summit: Six time national champ Lady Vols basketball coach

    5. Sam Houston: First president and then governor of Texas

    6. Howard Baker Jr.: "What did the president know and when did he know it?"

    7. Alex Haley: Pulitzer Prize winning author of "Roots"

    8. Cordell Hull: FDR's Secretary of State, "Father of the United Nations"

    9. Andrew Johnson: Lincoln's vice president, first president to be impeached

    10. Sequoyah: Invented the Cherokee alphabet, published the first Native-American newspaper

    You can see the list here (free registration required), along with a short bio of each.

    (Memo to Texas: You're welcome.)
    posted by R. Neal at 6:58 AM | Email this post

    Congrats to Pam at the Blend!

    I missed the "unofficial" announcement last Friday -- but now it's official: one of my favorite bloggers (and my Durham homey) Pam Spaulding of Pam's House Blend ("always steamin'") has won a 2005 Weblog Award for "Best LGBT Blog." Congrats, Pam!
    posted by Chris Kromm at 6:39 AM | Email this post

    Monday, December 19, 2005

    Southern Dems lead charge against Bush

    Two Southern Democrats -- one black, one white -- issued the strongest statements yet against disclosures htat President Bush broke the law in authorizing domestic eavesdropping. Via Political Wire:
    Rep. John Lewis (D-GA) said President Bush should be impeached if he authorized the spying on American citizens, the AP reports. Lewis, who said he would “sign a bill of impeachment if one was drawn up,” is the “first major House figure to suggest impeaching Bush.”

    In a speech on the Senate floor, Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WV) also took Bush to task: "These renegade assaults on the Constitution and our system of laws strike at the very core of our values, and foster a sense of mistrust and apprehension about the reach of government."
    It's not just Democrats. Former Georgia Rep. Bob Barr, a long-time defender of civil liberties, has been weighing in as well.

    ... Talking Points Memo has Sen. Jay Rockefeller's memo from July 2003 questioning the eavesdropping move. Those West Virginians won't give up.

    ... Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) came on "Face the Nation" to say Bush had "no legal basis" -- Crooks and Liars has the video.
    posted by Chris Kromm at 3:15 PM | Email this post

    GOP ties Gulf relief to drilling Alaska wildlife refuge, military budget

    A "Big Victory" -- that's how the Sun-Herald of Southern Mississippi (Biloxi) describes today's news that the House and Senate voted at 4 a.m. this morning to approve $29 billion in spending for hurricane relief.

    The amount is definitely an improvement for residents in Gulf states, who just last week were raging at President Bush's proposal to spend a miserly $3 billion for hurricane relief and rebuilding.

    The bill's biggest provision includes $11.5 billion in "block grants" to Mississippi and Louisiana, which they can use however they need to. There's also $2.75 billion for road and bridge repair, $2.89 billion for levee projects around New Orleans and studies on better protecting Gulf communities; and $1.6 billion for the Department of Education to help damaged schools and those serving evacuees.

    But not everyone is so enthusiastic. There's a lot of money for big projects and contracting, but not much to directly help hurricane survivors -- many who still face eviction. For example, the New Orleans Times-Picayune reports that one of the key items cut from the package was spending to help buy out homeowners in New Orleans:
    [A] bill backed by Louisiana officials to allow residents who lost their homes to Hurricane Katrina to recover a portion of their equity ran into Senate opposition and now likely won’t be taken up until next year.
    Most disturbing of all, though, is that -- in an obscene move -- Congressional leaders have made help for the Gulf Coast hinge entirely on approval of drilling in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, or ANWR.

    The Katrina relief package was added to the "must-pass" $453 billion defense budget. This means that for the Gulf states to get the aid, not only must Congress approve all the dubious war spending included there -- it must also approve ANWR, which has also been attached to the military spending bill.

    To make matters worse, the bill also makes billions of the Gulf relief money direcctly dependent on revenues from oil drilling in Alaska. As the Times-Picayune reports,
    The $29 billion hurricane assistance bill, which passed at 4 a.m. New Orleans time by 308-106, would, among other things, give Louisiana $2 billion as its share of bidding revenue and $4 billion over 30 years as the state's share of drilling royalty revenue -- all associated with the proposed exploration of Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, or ANWR. Another $1 billion would be produced from giving Louisiana a share of future digital spectrum bidding proceeds.

    Critics said the proposal, which also provides a financing source for heating and air-conditioning assistance for low-income households and for homeland security, was an attempt to buy support for the controversial drilling provisions long opposed by environmentalists.
    In other words, it's a trap, forcing those who oppose Arctic drilling to also position themselves against providing Gulf aid. Some Democrats have already pledged to fillibuster, a move which Republicans know will cause the party to be villified in Southern Gulf states.

    But Louisiana Senators David Vitter (R) and Mary Landrieu (D) are spinning the whole saga as a major victory, even suggesting that Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens -- the biggest supporter of drilling in the Refuge -- is offering to share the project's revenue out of the kindness of his heart:
    Both Vitter and Landrieu credited Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, with adding the revenue-sharing provisions to his ANWR proposal.

    "Sen. Stevens brought this idea to fruition after seeing the devastation along our coast firsthand and tonight gives us renewed hope for comprehensive protection for all the parishes through south Louisiana," Landrieu said.
    I can see Vitter, a long-time advocate for ANWR drilling, saying this. But Landrieu?
    posted by Chris Kromm at 10:50 AM | Email this post

    A short history of quagmires, from Florida to Iraq

    Bush's address about Iraq last night highlighted his new PR strategy for selling Iraq: in the face of widespread public demoralization about the war, the White House is going to keeping talking about how close we are to "victory" and "winning" the war (a strategy master-minded by a professor at Duke University here in Durham, N.C.).

    Given the new "victory" theme, it must annoy the White House more than anything to hear Iraq described as a "quagmire," a favorite choice among war critics. It sounds ugly. It invokes the long torment of Vietnam. And it has the advantage of side-stepping questions of whether the war is wrong or right, and cutting to the chase of what many Americans seem to care about: are we going to win?

    Our history books, despite recent improvements, still basically tell a story of "victory:" the U.S. may face hard challenges, but we ultimately tackle them and "win." It's an uplifting notion, but of course the reality is that our history has been filled with chronic issues over which we cannot declare victory.

    Consider one of our country's first "quagmires," as told by history professor William Loren Katz:
    The United States sunk into a quagmire soon after its troops invaded Florida in 1816 to capture runaway slaves and to close down the largest station of the underground railroad in North America which was run by escaped Africans and their Seminole allies and had been attracting thousands of enslaved people. The U.S. violent occupation lasted forty-two years, resulted in 1500 U.S. military deaths, and cost Congress and taxpayers $40,000,000, and brought devestation and misery to the penninsula.
    One of the most dramatic moments in this battle came on Christmas in 1837, when red and black Seminoles battled back Colonel Zachary Taylor near Lake Okeechobee, in Southern Florida. As Katz relates,
    On Christmas Day Colonel Taylor's men awoke to find 26 U.S. dead and 112 wounded. Four dead Seminoles died and none had been captured. The battle at Lake Okeechobee was the most devestating U.S. defeat in more than four decades of Florida warfare, and one of its of the worst defeats in centuries of aggression against Native Americans.
    And how did Col. Taylor spin the event?
    Taylor's army limped back to Fort Gardner, and as his men tended the wounded and mourned the dead, he wrote a report that declared victory and claimed "the Indians were driven in every direction."
    Sound familiar?
    posted by Chris Kromm at 9:53 AM | Email this post

    Koufax Awards Madness

    I've started getting emails from readers, letting me know that they're nominating Facing South for the 2005 Koufax Awards. (Thank you.)

    The awards are hosted by the fabulous Wampum and aim to honor the best blogging on the progessive side of the 'net. Here are the categories (for an explanation, visit here):

    - Best Blog
    - Best Blog -- Pro Division (sponsored by a journalism organization -- I guess we sort-of fall in this category)
    - Best Blog Community
    - Best Writing
    - Best Post
    - Best Series
    - Best Single Issue Blog
    - Best Group Blog
    - Most Humorous Blog
    - Most Humorous Post
    - Most Deserving of Wider Recognition
    - Best Expert Blog
    - Best New Blog
    - Best Coverage of State or Local Issues
    - Best Commenter

    The two caetgories folks have mentioned for Facing South are "Best New Blog" (we launched in February 2005) and "Most Deserving of Wider Recognition," which is always a nice thing. If you'd like to weigh in, go here and leave a message in the comments.

    But watch out -- you'll get sucked into reading everyone else's picks, and stumble across some great new blogs!

    Which leads to one of my thoughts about the awards bid'ness. The challenge is that there are so many great blogs out there. How can you capture all the great work being done with a few awards?

    The whole awards thing can also get out of control (just look at journalists, who I'm convinced give themselves more awards than any other profession). But given the time and energy good bloggers pour into their craft -- usually without compensation -- I think we need more, not less, institutions like the Koufax Awards to honor these efforts.

    I'll pass along some of my picks later today ...

    P.S. -- I should note that R. Neal, the other blogger at Facing South, won "Most Deserving of Wider Recognition" when he ran South Knox Bubba in 2003. Let's see if we can win him another one!
    posted by Chris Kromm at 8:44 AM | Email this post

    Southern Scandal Watch: Frist's AIDS charity

    Still burdened with nagging questions about his stock sales, Senate Majority Leader and presidential hopeful Bill Frist (R-TN) was likely not filled with good cheer to see a lengthy AP story yesterday, looking into his AIDS charity World of Hope, Inc. Here's the lead:
    Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist's AIDS charity paid nearly a half-million dollars in consulting fees to members of his political inner circle, according to tax returns providing the first financial accounting of the presidential hopeful's nonprofit.
    Cronyism in a charity dedicated to helping destitute AIDS patients might seem bad enough, but the story is full of other potential mini-scandals. For example:

    WHO GAVE THE MONEY AND WHY? The "lion's share" of World of Hope's $4.4 million budget came "from just 18 sources." Who were these generous givers? "The donors included several corporations with frequent business before Congress, such as insurer Blue Cross/Blue Shield, manufacturer 3M, drug maker Eli Lilly and the Goldman Sachs investment firm."

    Politicians often have benefactors give money to charities they control as a way to get around campaign finance laws -- there are no spending limits, the exact gift amount is undisclosed, and hey, it's for charity, right?

    WHERE DID THE MONEY GO? Some $3 million of the money World of Hope raised went to actual reflief groups. Who were they? The story lists some legitimate operations, like Africaire. But it says money also went to "evangelical Christian groups with ties to Republicans — Franklin Graham's Samaritan's Purse and the Rev. Luis Cortes' Esperanza USA."

    Samaritan's Purse got $490,000. You may remember Graham's group from 2003, when they announced bold plans to follow U.S. troops into Iraq to convert the Muslim heathens (they've downplayed those plans recently). Their record on HIV/AIDS relief is just as bad, according to a good piece in The Nation last December:
    [Samaritan's Purse], headed by the Rev. Franklin Graham (who called Islam an "evil" religion), was censured just three years ago for proselytizing while using a USAID grant to assist Salvadoran earthquake victims. At a Christian AIDS conference in February 2002 (attended by USAID officials), Graham indicated that he'd bring the same approach to HIV prevention, declaring, "Only a massive societal change in behavior can stop the spread of AIDS, and only Jesus Christ can bring about this change."
    As for Esperanza USA, the piece notes that "Cortes, Esperanza USA's president, is an influential evangelical leader who hosted Bush at this year's National Hispanic Prayer Breakfast."

    The charity has been riddled with politics since the beginning, according to the AP:
    Frist formed the charity in 2003. It drew attention in August 2004 when it held a benefit concert in New York during the Republican National Convention at which President Bush was nominated for re-election."
    Maybe the IRS should stop looking into small churches and focus some attention here?
    posted by Chris Kromm at 7:30 AM | Email this post

    Friday, December 16, 2005

    Tort reformer Lott goes to court

    David Sirota has the goods:
    NOW:

    "Mississippi Sen. Trent Lott and his wife sued State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. to force the insurer to pay for damage to their house in Pascagoula on the Gulf of Mexico, which was destroyed by Hurricane Katrina."
    - Wall Street Journal, 12/16/05

    THEN:

    "The Democrats seem to think that the answer is a lawsuit. Sue everybody."
    - Sen. Trent Lott, 7/20/01

    "I'm among many Mississippi citizens who believe tort reform is needed."
    - Sen. Trent Lott, 5/8/02

    "You know, obviously we should [enact tort reform]...Someday it will happen, and the sooner the better."
    - Sen. Trent Lott, 1/24/01

    " Sen. Trent Lott of Mississippi today credited the agenda of tax cuts, deregulation and tort reform initiatives passed by the Congress and signed into law by President Bush with the overall upturn in the national economy."
    - Sen. Trent Lott press release, 12/2/05

    "If their answer to everything is more lawsuits, then yes, that's a problem, because I certainly don't support that."
    - Sen. Trent Lott, 8/2/02

    "It's sue, sue, sue... That's not the answer."
    - Sen. Trent Lott, 8/4/01
    posted by Chris Kromm at 2:43 PM | Email this post

    Southern Scandal Watch: Reed admits "misstep"

    After months of attempting to run from the scandals surrounding Jack Abramoff, Ralph Reed -- a GOP candidate for Georgia Lt. Governor, with an eye on the governor's mansion -- says he agrees the connection was unsavory:
    Ralph Reed, the political strategist and candidate for lieutenant governor, said recently that his work for disgraced Washington lobbyist Jack Abramoff was a mistake that — if given the chance — he wouldn't repeat.

    "Had I known then what I know now, I would not have undertaken that work," Reed said, according to the text of a speech posted on his campaign Web site this week.

    Interestingly enough, Reed's statement never addresses the substance of the controversy -- namely, that Abramoff funneled $5 million to Reed from Indian gambling interests, while Reed conducted high-profile anti-gambling campaigns in Texas, Louisiana and Alabama.

    Such moral relativism from a champion of family values has earned Reed a growing list of detractors -- including, unfortunately for Reed, leaders of the Christian Right:
    [R]eed's remarks ... may also be a reaction to rising Christian concerns about his connections to the Abramoff scandal.

    Last month, the evangelical weekly World, with a national circulation of 140,000, published a critical piece about Reed that portrayed the former head of the Christian Coalition as a "shrewd businessman who has spent years leveraging his evangelical and conservative contacts."
    Next edition of Scandal Watch: Democratic leader Jim Black in North Carolina also admits "missteps," growing crisis of bad political footwork feared.
    posted by Chris Kromm at 8:50 AM | Email this post

    Friday Bird Blogging

    posted by R. Neal at 4:08 AM | Email this post

    Thursday, December 15, 2005

    GOP rises to the defense of candy canes

    According to Thomas, Rep. Davis (R-VA) introduced this last week. Here are the deliberations from yesterday:
    Dec. 14, 2005 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

    H. RES. 579 Expressing the sense of the House that the symbols and traditions of Christmas should be protected.

    Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia submitted the following

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
    (1) recognizes the importance of the symbols and traditions of Christmas;
    (2) strongly disapproves of attempts to ban references to Christmas; and
    (3) expresses support for the use of these symbols and traditions.

    **********************
    Mr. ISRAEL. Madam Speaker, My difficulty with this resolution is that
    it excludes some symbols and includes only certain symbols. So I would ask the gentlewoman, in the spirit of diversity, and of the many faiths that we celebrate in this body and throughout America, I would ask her not to withdraw the resolution, but allow this resolution to attract a very significant number of votes, maybe a unanimous vote, simply by adding the words "Kwanzaa,'' "Ramadan,'' and "Chanukah'' to her resolution. . . include holidays of all faiths so that this resolution can reflect the best of America, which is a place of justice for all.

    Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia. Madam Speaker, The reason for this
    resolution is that the attack has not been on the menorah or any of the other symbols of the other religions. But the attack has been and is being made on red and green colors, on candy canes, on Santa Claus, which are not even religious symbols. That is the point of the resolution.
    Read a news account here. I believe we're headed towards a McCarthy-era, "have you no shame?" moment soon.

    (Thanks to reader LK in South Carolina)
    posted by Chris Kromm at 1:22 PM | Email this post

    Death of an American City - Bush's legacy?

    Posted by R. Neal

    Read this NYT editorial:
    We are about to lose New Orleans. Whether it is a conscious plan to let the city rot until no one is willing to move back or honest paralysis over difficult questions, the moment is upon us when a major American city will die, leaving nothing but a few shells for tourists to visit like a museum.

    We said this wouldn't happen. President Bush said it wouldn't happen. He stood in Jackson Square and said, "There is no way to imagine America without New Orleans." But it has been over three months since Hurricane Katrina struck and the city is in complete shambles.

    There are many unanswered questions that will take years to work out, but one is make-or-break and needs to be dealt with immediately. It all boils down to the levee system. People will clear garbage, live in tents, work their fingers to the bone to reclaim homes and lives, but not if they don't believe they will be protected by more than patches to the same old system that failed during the deadly storm. Homeowners, businesses and insurance companies all need a commitment before they will stake their futures on the city.

    At this moment the reconstruction is a rudderless ship. There is no effective leadership that we can identify. How many people could even name the president's liaison for the reconstruction effort, Donald Powell? Lawmakers need to understand that for New Orleans the words "pending in Congress" are a death warrant requiring no signature...
    The Mrs. and I were just talking about Bush's Jackson Square speech the other day and wondering whatever happened to all those promises. The speech was reminiscent of his "Mission Accomplished" speech. Both had inspirational settings with carefully crafted backdrops and costumes appropriate for the occasion. But just as the violence and killing resumed and continue long after declaring victory in Iraq, New Orleans was left holding a bag of empty promises in the dark, long after the lights in Jackson Square went off as Bush departed.

    Bush is said to believe that he was chosen by God to lead us through perilous times. With the vindication of reelection, he now seeks to establish his legacy. Up until now, though, he's acted mostly as a cheerleader for a neoconservative movement run by doddering, recycled relics from the Cold War whose only interest is establishing dominion over the Middle East and its oil supplies.

    Faced with taking the heat for all their schemes and lies, the string of failed foreign and domestic policies, his growing political impotence, his declining polls, and rampant scandals within his party and his own administration, he now seems to be distancing himself from all that. Maybe he's decided that now would be a good time for him to assert his own ideas and leadership, but, no longer able to trust his inner circle, he's not sure where or how.

    Perhaps Bush will come to realize the enormity of the challenge facing America right here at home, and what a tremendous legacy saving New Orleans and rebuilding the Gulf Coast would be for his presidency. Politically, it would be a simple matter of declaring victory in Iraq and redeploying all the manpower and resources to our own Gulf region. With the threat of WMDs contained, Saddam's brutal regime toppled, and democracy and free elections flourishing, it seems our mission there is accomplished and another awaits us.

    If God is talking to Bush about his destiny, hopefully this is the message he is receiving.

    OK, then.
    posted by R. Neal at 1:20 PM | Email this post

    Iraqis vote in Nashville - what about Americans in New Orleans?

    Posted by R. Neal

    Thousands of Iraqi expatriates are voting this week in Nashville to elect the Iraqi Council of Representatives. The U.S. government has made provisions for Iraqis to participate in elections by setting up voting facilities for them in Nashville, Washington, Chicago, Detroit, Los Angeles, San Diego and San Francisco.

    Unfortunately, the U.S. government has not seen fit to make similar provisions for displaced Gulf Coast residents who were evacuated for Hurricane Katrina and have not been able to return. Legislation was introduced in the House (HR3734) and the Senate (S1867) that would give evacuees the right to use the same absentee balloting and registration procedures available to military and overseas voters under the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act. For some reason, both measures were referred to committee, never to be heard from again.

    And that's not the only problem with elections in Louisiana. Governor Blanco has ordered that local elections in New Orleans, originally scheduled for February and March, will be postponed indefinitely. Here's a summary of some other problems and an interesting article on how the political landscape might change for Democrats in Louisiana which might explain why Congress is dragging its feet.
    posted by R. Neal at 8:43 AM | Email this post

    Swiftboating Phil

    Posted by R. Neal

    As hard as it is to work up much sympathy for the guy, Democratic Tennessee Governor Phil Bredesen appears to be the victim of a coordinated swiftboat-style political attack campaign. The problem is that Bredesen keeps shooting himself in the foot whenever he tries to deflect the incoming fire.

    Click "there's more" for the rest of the story...
    The first shot was fired back in May when a Nashville TV news investigative report charged that the state tourism director improperly awarded a large PR contract to a friend. Bredesen was reportedly "furious" and ordered his own investigation. The investigation found no wrongdoing and concluded the bids were handled properly according to state law. Despite this, the contract was subsequently canceled.

    Also in May, Bredesen's office was stung by a sexual harassment complaint, prompting the Governor to fire his top lobbyist. Fast forward to this month, when an AP investigative report criticized the state's handling of sexual harassment complaints. The report notes that Bredesen ordered statewide workplace harassment training in 2004 which one employee said has resulted in a "more businesslike" atmosphere, but goes on to say there is no consistent policy or enforcement, and that in some cases evidence has been destroyed.

    Last month, the Tennessean ran an investigative report suggesting ties between political campaign contributions and Tennessee Highway Patrol promotions, noting that two-thirds of those promoted had made contributions to Bredesen's campaign. Bredesen denied the charges of favoritism, but Republican lawmakers accused him of "shaking down" state employees for contributions in return for favors.

    Amid growing concerns about corruption in the department, Bredesen then ordered background checks on all 855 state troopers, and found that 48 had prior criminal charges. In the wake of all this, Col. Lynn Pitts, commander of the Tennessee Highway Patrol with 31 years on the job, was fired for bidding on a $1700 aluminum fishing boat that had been confiscated by the THP and put up for sale at a state surplus property auction. It's against state law for anyone directly or indirectly involved in the seizure of property to bid on it. Pitts says he didn't know this. State Safety Commissioner Fred Philips asked for his resignation anyway.

    The next day, State Safety Commissioner Fred Philips resigned and Deputy Commissioner Tom Moore retired, presumably at the request of the Governor. No reason was given, other than the Governor's statement that state troopers "deserve a department as good as they are, and this is a first step toward making sure that happens."

    But wait, there's more. Bredesen hired a security consulting firm to help TDOT commissioner and now temporary Safety Commissioner Gerald Nicely investigate allegations of cronyism and ethical misconduct and make recommendations. But it turns out that the no-bid contract was awarded to a firm which has a subsidiary in Nashville whose senior advisor made large campaign contributions to Bredesen in the past.

    In the middle of all this, Bredesen is being criticized for shepherding "secret" legislation through the state legislature to provide Nissan Corp. $200 million, or $50K per job, in relocation assistance for moving their headquarters from California to Tennessee.

    On the one hand, I admire the way Bredesen tackles these issues head-on and takes swift, decisive action, similar to how early in his tenure he handled a scandal involving a U.T. president by summarily firing him and ending the controversy. On the other hand, it sometimes seems that, in his desire to avoid even the appearance of impropriety, he may sometimes overreact.

    For example, firing the THP commander and ending his 31 year law enforcement career for bidding on a $1700 fishing boat seems a little harsh to me. Spending up to $200,000 for consultants to investigate ethical lapses in the THP seems imprudent. Besides, some of this stuff sounds relatively trivial. Fixing tickets is a long-standing tradition in law enforcement. Who hasn't had a ticket fixed? If there is more going on than what is being reported, it should be disclosed.

    I thought politicians understood that politics is a tough game with high stakes and you need to be pretty thick-skinned to play. If Bredesen fires somebody every time he or someone in state government is criticized by some enterprising local TeeVee reporter there won't be anybody left to run the state. You have to wonder how a really tough poliltician, somebody like, say, Bill Clinton, would handle it. My guess is he would tell some of these people to shut up and take a hike.

    Anyway, it's hard to tell where all this is coming from -- disgruntled Democrats feeling betrayed by some of Bredesen's less-than-progressive policies (i.e. dismantling TennCare), or the powerful GOP attack machine that just wants to put an R in the Governor's office next year. Either way, the Governor does not appear to be handling it well.

    OK, then.
    posted by R. Neal at 8:02 AM | Email this post

    Wikipedia "pretty accurate," Tennessean ex-publisher might disagree

    I've always viewed Wikipedia as a useful starting point for research -- not the kind of source that I'd quote for anything, but a good place to turn for general background to explore further.

    Well it turns out the Florida-based operation may not be much better or worse than other sources, according to a story in the AP today:
    Wikipedia, the encyclopedia that relies on volunteers to pen nearly 4 million articles, is about as accurate in covering scientific topics as Encyclopedia Britannica, the journal Nature wrote in an online article published Wednesday.

    The finding, based on a side-by-side comparison of articles covering a broad swath of the scientific spectrum, comes as Wikipedia faces criticism over the accuracy of some of its entries.
    The incident which launched recent scrutiny of Wiki has Southern roots, and is particularly unfortunate. As the news story relates,
    Two weeks ago prominent journalist John Seigenthaler, the former publisher of the Tennessean newspaper and founding editorial director of USA Today, revealed that a Wikipedia entry that ran for four months had incorrectly named him as a longtime suspect in the assassinations of president John F. Kennedy and his brother Robert.
    Southern Exposure readers will recoganize Seigenthaler's name; we profiled him in a 2004 issue (story in print edition only, but here's the issue).Under his leadership, The Tennessean was a crusading paper for progressive change. From SE:
    Day in and day out, The Tennessean challenged powerful political machines and corrupt corporations, exposed scandals in the society class, and even took on the revered Tennessee Valley Authority ... The Tennessean exposed fraud in city government, environmental damage caused by coal mining, and abuse in retirement homes. It fought vigorously for civil rights.
    Reporting that Seigenthaler may have killed Kennedy is an especially bizarre mistake, given their association:
    In 1957, he investigated the Teamsters Union in Tennessee, which, at the time, was engaged in systematic violence, intimidation, and the bribery of a judge. His reports got the attention of then chief counsel to the Senate Labor-Management Rackets Committee chair Robert F. Kennedy, who brought the committee to Tennessee. The two men became fast friends, and in 1960 Seigenthaler joined Kennedy's Justice Department at the attorney general's right-hand man.
    So you can see why he was a little upset. I doubt a mix-up of that calliber would appear in Brittanica, but who knows? As the AP story shows, the two are neck-and-neck in the errors department.
    posted by Chris Kromm at 7:23 AM | Email this post

    Wednesday, December 14, 2005

    Facing South down

    For reasons still not entirely clear, our web host was down most of today. Sorry for the interruption, Facing South will be back Thursday.
    posted by Chris Kromm at 11:56 PM | Email this post

    Thanks to you, we made the challenge!

    We did it! Thanks to you, our dear readers, our end-of-year fundraiser has been a huge success.

    I should wait until we update our cool money-meter graphic on the right, but I can't wait to share the good news: we have met the $7,500 challenge, which means an anonymous donor will match, dollar-for-dollar, $7,500 worth of contributions.

    This brings our holiday fundraising total to $15,000 -- a knock-out number by itself, and also just $5,000 shy of our campaign's $20,000 goal.

    So if you're still thinking about where to make a tax-deductible gift this merry holiday season, think about making Institute for Southern Studies by visiting here.

    Money raised now will go to the Institute Investigative Fund, which makes possible important projects like Gulf Coast Reconstruction Watch, to promote an open and accountable rebuilding of the hurricane-ravaged South.

    Thank you! We couldn't do these critical projects without you, and we are deeply grateful for every bit of support.

    PS -- Old schoolers (it's ok, we know you're out there) can mail their tax-deductible gift to: ISS, P.O. Box 531, Durham, NC 27702.
    posted by Chris Kromm at 11:21 AM | Email this post

    Tuesday, December 13, 2005

    Dear France:

    Posted by R. Neal

    A New Orleans resident and homeowner wants to renegotiate the Louisiana Purchase...
    posted by R. Neal at 9:34 AM | Email this post

    Bush: I am not a racist!

    Posted by R. Neal

    President Bush said in a speech yesterday that the federal government's response to Katrina was "appalling" but it was not racially motivated and he is not a racist.

    You know what? I believe him.

    First of all, he wasn't really involved. He was on vacation and couldn't be bothered. I don't think he was on the phone telling Brownie to let all those black people suffer and die in the Superdome and the Convention Center just because they were black. Second of all, Bush's life of privilege has isolated him from issues of race and poverty, and, like most middle and upper class white folks, he just doesn't relate to or even think very much about "those people" whatever color they might be. This isn't overtly racist per se, although white America is genetically programmed by generations of fear and distrust.

    What I do think, though, is that the ineffective response was influenced by the conservative Republican principle that poor people are only poor because of their own shortcomings. They are lazy and don't want to work. They just want a handout and a free ride. They're too stupid and lazy to prepare for a disaster such as Katrina, so society owes them nothing. The Good Lord helps those who help themselves.

    The notion of "entitlement", such as attending the best schools regardless of academic qualification, receiving multi-million dollar bonuses for figuring out new ways to short-change workers and consumers, or getting large no-bid government contracts because you have friends in high places, does not apply to those slipping through society's safety net who need a hand up and a level playing field. Or just a hot meal and a cot to sleep on when a natural disaster destroys their homes and communities.

    In the post I linked to above (which you really should read), Digby disagrees and thinks "poor" is code for "black" and that trying to reframe the problem of poverty as a class issue masks the real problem of cultural and institutional racism. That may be generally true in the South, but Bush isn't really a Southerner. He's a wealthy Kennebunkport scion pursuing his destiny and doesn't trouble his beautiful mind with such notions.

    Either way, no one, not even Bush, can deny that the federal government's "appalling" response to Katrina revealed institutionalized incompetence at the highest levels. Conservative "anti-socialist" values, racially tinged or not, are no excuse for incompetence. Such "values" do, however, give right-wing conservatives plenty of cover for their indifference and their unwillingness to help the people of the Gulf, especially if it means higher taxes or diverting funds from pet projects and miserable foreign policy failures.

    OK, then.
    posted by R. Neal at 9:20 AM | Email this post

    Monday, December 12, 2005

    FEMA forced to extend hotel stays, but post-hurricane housing still a national crisis

    Thanks to a class-action lawsuit brought by public interest lawyers, FEMA is being forced to extend the length of time they'll help Katrina survivors stay in hotels:
    NEW ORLEANS - A program that put Hurricane Katrina evacuees in hotels at government expense while they sought other housing must be extended until Feb. 7, a month beyond the deadline set by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, a federal judge ruled Monday.

    Judge Stanwood Duval's temporary restraining order came in a class action lawsuit filed in November by advocates for hurricane victims. Attorneys pressing the lawsuit said FEMA should not be allowed to end the hotel program because it has failed to provide other housing aid, such as rental assistance checks, to many victims who qualify for it.

    Also, information on how to apply for the aid has been slow to reach those who need it most, the attorneys said.
    It's a nice reprieve, but all it does is underscore the staggering housing crisis that remains in the Gulf as the critical battleground for Katrina survivors.

    FEMA's relentless push to kick survivors out of their current housing arrangement speaks volumes about our country's national priorities. It also ignores an important question: where do they expect these people to go?

    For home owners, many insurance companies are dragging their feet in paying claims, with those at the bottom of the economic ladder discovering gaping holes in coverage. Some people I met with in New Orleans last week still hadn't heard from their insurance companies, 100+ days after the storms.

    Many of these home owners, broke and nowhere to go, will take the route of what we're hearing is happening in Biloxi's south side -- hundreds of families selling their homes to the first developer who contacts them and offers money, always way below the real estate's value.

    For renters, landlords keep pushing to evict their tenants (check out this short video about the situation). Groups like the Grassroots Legal Network in New Orleans push back, winning victories like the recent 45-day stay on evictions. But these only slow down the juggernaut -- it's a delaying action, not a solution.

    In the midst of it all is a Gulf Coast economy that has been blown apart, a dearth of jobs, a government infrastructure that's fast being dismantled. People have run out of money, have no job prospects, and now face nowhere to stay.

    Bold government leadership, like a commitment to invest, say, $10-20 billion in public works projects to hire people and rebuild the city, could have a huge impact. Strengthening the rights of tenants and home-owners, versus landlords and developers, would level the playing field.

    But at the moment, our country's leaders are willing to sit on the sidelines and watch hurricane survivors fend off powerful economic interests and battle over the remaining crumbs -- and feel grateful for small victories, like getting another month in a hotel room.
    posted by Chris Kromm at 11:35 AM | Email this post

    New Gulf-watching at Gulf Coast Reconstruction Watch

    In case you missed it, we've recently posted some great stories over at Gulf Coast Reconstruction Watch, our spin-off project to investigate events in the post-hurricane South:

    *** Mississippi Gulf native Lindsey Brown reports on how the media coverage has bypassed small towns like Pass Christian that were decimated by Katrina in her home state.

    *** Watch Contributing Editor Joe Atkins has an interesting piece from Mississippi on how preserving cultural heritage can ensure that rebuilding can avoid "Disney-fied" development.

    *** And Tim Shorrock, a writer for Mother Jones and The Nation, offers "Voices from the Ninth Ward," a ground-level take on what people in eastern New Orleans are doing to move forward in the vacuum of federal response.

    After catching our breath from our four-day whirlwind trip in Louisiana and Mississippi, we'll be posting more first-hand reports -- stay tuned!
    posted by Chris Kromm at 10:01 AM | Email this post

    Bush politicking delayed Nat'l Guard for a WEEK after Katrina

    One of the most contentious issues about the failed Hurricane Katrina response is why our country's on-call, always-ready troops didn't arrive in Louisiana to help until September 5, a week after the storm hit.

    The issue has been subjected to endless hype and spin: the Bush team claims they were never given authority to act, Louisiana's Gov. Blanco says Washington was unresponsive, and others pointing to the larger context of our stretched-out armed forces, especially the National Guard.

    Reporter Robert Travis Scott attempts to unravel the truth in a good piece in the New Orleans Times-Picayune, drawing mostly on the mountain of documents Louisiana officials have turned over to Congress investigating the Katrina response.

    But the story's headline -- "Politics delayed troops dispatch to N.O." -- doesn't match the evidence in the story that it was the White House, not just "politics," that caused hundreds to die as residents waited for troops to arrive.

    Both the Bush Administration and Louisiana officials were involved in political jockeying. The story, which focuses on the Louisiana side, reveals painful emails that show how much time and energy state leaders were pouring into PR battles in the heart of the disaster:

    "By the weekend, the Bush administration will have a full-blown PR disaster/scandal on their hands because of the late response to needs in New Orleans," according to a Sept. 1 e-mail message sent by Blanco communications director Bob Mann ...

    Kopplin advised the Blanco staff by e-mail that "we need to keep working to get our national surrogates to explain the facts."

    But Blanco and Louisiana officials had every right to be concerned, because the White House was waging a PR battle of its own:
    Any paranoia that Blanco officials might have had about a GOP agenda was fed by phone calls and e-mail messages from national media and other sources. For example, an ABC News reporter wrote Blanco's press secretary, "2 senior GOP aides have called me to suggest we should be focusing more blame on Governor Blanco." ...

    An e-mail message between Blanco aides said a prominent New Orleans banker "called . . . this morning and has it on very good authority that (White House strategist) Karl Rove is directing effort to put blame on kbb (governor) for mess saying that the reason feds not on ground sooner was that she refused to give up her authority."

    It's tempting to stop there, and blame both sides for allowing hundreds to die while they tried to get a one-up in the media spin wars. There's some truth to this, but buried in the story is the deeper issue that led to the armed-forces stand-off: who would be in control.

    The issue was never -- as the White House and right-wing pundits attempted to claim -- that Blanco and Louisiana leaders hadn't asked for troop involvement. The story marshalls evidence which shows that this claim is at best an excuse, and at worst a lie:

    * On the day Katrina hit, Blanco told Bush "We need everything you've got" -- which made Bush's claim a day later that the governor had "not specifically requested troops" look like he was wiggling out on a technicality.

    * On August 30, after a trip to the Superdome, Blanco's National Guard chief, Maj. Gen. Bennett Landreneau, specifically requested federal military involvement to Lt. Gen. Russel Honore of the federal response task force, and Lt. Gen. Steven Blum, chief of the National Guard Bureau.

    * On August 31, "Blanco called Bush at 2:20 p.m. to say she wanted a federal troop mobilization 'today' and asked that someone communicate to her when the soldiers would arrive."

    So Louisiana asked for troops. The hold-up was about who would be in command: the Bush Administration wanted to "federalize" the operation, including taking over control of the Louisiana National Guard. Blanco and Louisiana officials wanted to retain oversight.

    The White House was especially adamant about a federal take-over. The drama reached its height on August 31, when Louisiana leaders discovered that Karl Rove was making federalization a crusade from his White House perch:

    [T]he mention of Rove, a shrewd and aggressive molder of public opinion, was a red flag. Blanco aides feared his involvement meant the federalization issue had become a political flash point, as internal memos indicated that week. At one point a memo from Kopplin said, "Rove is on the prowl."
    Let's step back and ask a question: Why was an administration made up of states' rights Republicans pushing for a federal take-over of the National Guard response? Blanco's team feared it was a way for Bush to step in and appear the hero after public outrage at the botched hurricane response.

    But more to the point, there was no reason for Governor Blanco to give up control. And experts she consulted told her she shouldn't, especially considering that the main point of federal intervention -- getting other states to commit their guard detachments -- wasn't an issue, since many were already sending them, some without approval:

    Blanco officials talked to military brass about the consequences of federalizing, with most officers advising the governor to maintain control over her Guard troops.

    Among the most important recommendations was the one by Blum, the National Guard Bureau chief, who said the governor had nothing to gain by federalizing her Guard, according to Ryder's notes. Besides, massive numbers of Guard units now were flowing in quickly from other states, Blum pointed out.
    There were also legal issues about limits on federally-controlled troops engaging in local policing -- which the White House, instead of acknowledging, tasked the Department of Justice with finding out ways to get around.

    So what ended up happening? On September 3, President Bush sauntered into the White House Rose Garden to announce federal troop deployments.

    Under Bush's order that morning, Blanco and Landreneau [of Louisiana] would keep authority over the Guard, and the president and Honore [of the federal response] would rule federal forces in the region.

    It was the same point they had started with when Landreneau had called Honore four days earlier asking for help.

    Let's repeat that: they ended up using the proposal for troop deployment that Louisiana officials had conceded to four days earlier, delayed largely by the White House's insistence on a takeover of the operation.

    Make no mistake: as many have said, there is plenty of blame to spread around in criticizing the Katrina response. But in the rush for "balance" and he-said, she-said reporting, let's not forget there are sometimes basic truths -- in this case, the fact that the White House's zeal for control and a PR victory resulted in hundreds of lost lives:

    [By the time troops were deployed], many people had died, or had lived through frightful and inhumane conditions waiting to be rescued or bused out. By the end of the day, the Superdome and convention center would be evacuated.

    For more Katrina coverage, visit Facing South's spinoff investigative project, Gulf Coast Reconstruction Watch

    posted by Chris Kromm at 9:40 AM | Email this post

    Friday, December 09, 2005

    Survivors have a voice

    I spent all of today in a church in Jackson, Mississippi for the Katrina Survivor's Assembly. The meeting, organized by the People's Hurricane Relief Fund, was composed of some 150 survivors from around the country, and about the same number of allies from Oregon to New York and all points in-between.

    For the last 100 days since Katrina hit, we've heard plenty from the politicians about what they think the hurrican survivors need, and what they're going to provide. It was refreshing to hear from those affected what they think the real issues are.

    For example: A woman from Biloxi, MS -- one of the towns most severely hit by the hurricanes, but which has received scant national media attention -- noted that most of the "rebuilding" efforts have centered on business development, jump-starting commerce, getting "economic activity" going again. Homeowners are at a standstill, waiting on reluctant insurance companies, an absent FEMA, somebody to help them with rebuilding that would allow them to return.

    The priorities are not only morally questionable, they don't make much economic sense, either. As she observered, "Who do they think are going to shop at the stores?"

    The survivors assembled also wanted to know what happened to the billions allocated to FEMA, and raised by charities like the Red Cross. Both agencies refused to provide aid to many distressed areas because of "security concerns" (and FEMA outposts are still heavily guarded by multiple public and private security forces, for threats that aren't clear).

    Another over-riding issue: the "right of return," which has been denied to many families in neighborhoods like the devastated Lower 9th Ward of New Orleans. The "Lower Nine" was opened just last week, and even now can only be accessed by residents making visits to check on their property.

    The issue is a hotly contested one, even among progressive activists. A good number see the Lower 9 as so devastated, so toxic, and so vulnerable to future storms, that investing in returning families there would be to throw them into a risky public health situation, and put them at the mercy of future storms. On the other side are survivors who see the principle of self-determination to be the most important, the need to respect the wishes of the families to return to the places they call home.

    These first-hand perspectives are hard to find in the mainstream media. The survivors assembled today seemed keenly aware that they have been portrayed as pious surferers or, worse, undeserving or criminal. Usually their stories are told in isolation, with no sense of a common agenda to shape their own destiny.

    Of course, this meeting only touched a small fraction of those affected. The Fund plans to take this approach on the road early next year, hearing from thousands more. They will need all the support they can get.
    posted by Chris Kromm at 11:46 PM | Email this post

    Thursday, December 08, 2005

    100 days, part II

    When meeting with community leaders and grassroots activists in New Orleans, you hear several themes again and again:

    -- Things aren't getting better. There's nothing wrong with the media focusing on success stories, but to relate those pieces without acknowledging the fact that for tens of thousands of people life is "standing still," is, as one put it, "irresponsible."

    -- Nobody knows what's happening with the rebuilding process. The various commissions and task forces devoted to reconstruction are secretive, and driven by "a small coterie of self-interested developers," says one long-time community organizer. Community input is not only absent, it's "actively discouraged."

    -- We have yet to hear a kind word about FEMA or the Red Cross.

    -- For people here, to see the "Katrina issue" falling off the national radar -- in the media, and in Washington politics -- seems "criminal." Most have despaired of any meaningful policy response. As one told us, "we have no illusions we're going to win on the important issues. All we can do is delay the bad."

    -- The prevailing mood that "we can't count anyone to look out for us" has led those who are able to take matters into their own hands, like the Common Ground Clinic's impressive series of free medical clinics and food distribution centers. (More later on this impressive operation.)

    That's the view from the ground. Compare how New Orleans residents view the situation, to what President Bush promised in his declaration from the city on September 15, 2005:
    Tonight so many victims of the hurricane and the flood are far from home and friends and familiar things. You need to know that our whole nation cares about you, and in the journey ahead you're not alone. To all who carry a burden of loss, I extend the deepest sympathy of our country. To every person who has served and sacrificed in this emergency, I offer the gratitude of our country. And tonight I also offer this pledge of the American people: Throughout the area hit by the hurricane, we will do what it takes, we will stay as long as it takes, to help citizens rebuild their communities and their lives.

    [T]he federal government will undertake a close partnership with the states of Louisiana and Mississippi, the city of New Orleans, and other Gulf Coast cities, so they can rebuild in a sensible, well-planned way. Federal funds will cover the great majority of the costs of repairing public infrastructure in the disaster zone, from roads and bridges to schools and water systems. Our goal is to get the work done quickly. And taxpayers expect this work to be done honestly and wisely