PO Box 531  •  Durham,NC 27702  •  Telephone: (919) 419-8311  •  Fax: (919) 419-8315

Tuesday, April 01, 2008

NOLA public housing advocates bid good riddance to HUD chief, urge policy change

The following statement is from the Advancement Project, a civil rights group that filed a lawsuit against U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Secretary Alphonso Jackson on behalf of New Orleans public housing residents shut out of their homes after Hurricane Katrina. Under investigation for alleged corruption and cronyism in contracting decisions, Jackson announced yesterday that he is resigning April 18. The Advancement Project points out that while the Katrina disaster caused the worst affordable housing crisis in recent history, HUD responded by demolishing thousands of habitable public units accessible to the poor and championing a redevelopment plan that replaces only 20 percent of them:
Alphonso Jackson will be most remembered for having turned his back on the people of New Orleans. We are glad to see him go, but the damage has been done. The people suffering, without a place to call home, are the people of New Orleans; the thousands of families who lived in public housing before Katrina and the working poor, many of whom remain displaced outside the city they used to call home.

While it is HUD's mission to provide affordable housing across the country, the exact opposite took place in the recovery and rebuilding of New Orleans. It therefore comes as no surprise that Jackson is under criminal investigation for his post-Katrina dealings. HUD agents, city officials, and developers appeared to have colluded in the largest Black removal in U.S. history. HUD's intent in New Orleans was never to bring back the majority-black and working poor residents of New Orleans. In the storm’s aftermath, when Jackson said that "New Orleans was not going to be as black as it had been for a long time, if ever again," we realized that we had to fight for people's right to return home.

In addition to the lawsuit filed by the Advancement Project, residents organized themselves and met with members of Congress, including Representative Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), who took the lead to pass the Gulf Coast Hurricane Housing Recovery Act of 2007 in the House. The legislation, opposed by HUD and now stuck in the Senate, would provide for one-for-one replacement of demolished units.

Secretary Jackson's resignation and tarnished tenure as the nation's housing chief should be a call to action for HUD to reverse decisions made in New Orleans and the Gulf Coast. With the change in leadership, HUD now has the opportunity to fulfill its mission and provide affordable housing for families who are still in desperate need.

(Photo by Craig Morse courtesy of survivorsvillage.com.)

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

posted by Sue Sturgis at 1:53 PM | Email this post | Post a Comment
1 Comments:
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I just got back from New Orleans. A key player told me stright up the lack of rental housing is a signifigant drag on the ability of the region to rebuild. HUD's demolition of livable housing units further reduced the pool of affordable rentals, and made the problem worse. And most of the aid to rebuilding is going to homeowners; there is bupkus going toward rebuilding rental housing.

4/04/2008 1:43 PM  

Post a Comment

Return to Facing South's main page

Southern News Update

Who Are These Folks?

CHRIS KROMM blogs three days a week for Facing South. Chris is Executive Director of the Institute for Southern Studies and publisher of the Institute’s award-winning magazine, Southern Exposure.

SUE STURGIS blogs four days a week for Facing South. Sue is the Institute’s Editorial Director and a former reporter for The Independent Weekly and The Raleigh News & Observer.

DESIREE EVANS blogs four days a week for Facing South. Desiree is a Research Associate at the Institute and former policy analyst for TransAfrica.

The views expressed on Facing South are those of the authors and not necessarily represent the views of the Institute for Southern Studies. The editors reserve the right to reject comments that are abusive, offensive, misleading, or that promote commercial goods and services.

Previous Posts