This land is WHOSE land?
In our ongoing Southern drought coverage, you may recall us mentioning what at the time seemed like nothing more than a historical curiosity regarding the Tennessee border. It seems the team sent out in 1818 to survey the border missed the 35th parallel by about a mile because of substandard equipment and charts, putting a southern portion the Tennessee River that would have been in Georgia entirely in Tennessee.
Now, a genuine border dispute has erupted. Yesterday, the Georgia state legislature passed a resolution establishing a boundary commission to resurvey the border and move it one mile north so Georgia, which is running out of water in the Atlanta area, could tap the Tennessee River.
The bill was introduced in the Senate to the refrain of Senators singing "This land is my land, this land is your land," where it passed unanimously. The sponsor of the House bill said Georgia is prepared to go to court if Tennessee doesn't comply.
If the measure fails in court, Georgia could resort to drilling into the Tennessee River aquifer near the Georgia-Tennessee border. According to the Atlanta Business Chronicle, customers for Tennessee River water are already being lined up in the metro Atlanta area.
State officials in Tennessee are not amused.
From the Chattanooga Times Free Press
In a spirit of cooperation, however, Tennessee officials offered a couple of weeks ago to settle the matter by way of alternative dispute resolution, suggesting "a winner-take-all wrestling match or football game."
UPDATE: WPLN: Tennessee Legislature To Defend Border With Its Own Resolution
UPDATE: The New York Times takes notice:
Now, a genuine border dispute has erupted. Yesterday, the Georgia state legislature passed a resolution establishing a boundary commission to resurvey the border and move it one mile north so Georgia, which is running out of water in the Atlanta area, could tap the Tennessee River.
The bill was introduced in the Senate to the refrain of Senators singing "This land is my land, this land is your land," where it passed unanimously. The sponsor of the House bill said Georgia is prepared to go to court if Tennessee doesn't comply.
If the measure fails in court, Georgia could resort to drilling into the Tennessee River aquifer near the Georgia-Tennessee border. According to the Atlanta Business Chronicle, customers for Tennessee River water are already being lined up in the metro Atlanta area.
State officials in Tennessee are not amused.
From the Chattanooga Times Free Press
"I think they're embarrassing themselves, and I think it’s a waste of taxpayers’ money to have them going into session and doing such silly things on taxpayers’ time," said Rep. Gerald McCormick, R-Chattanooga, chairman of the Hamilton County legislative delegation.He is also quoted by WSMV Nashville:
He called "idiotic" and "crazy," the proposal that seeks to take a mile-wide strip of southern Tennessee, including a chunks of Chattanooga and East Ridge.
"I don't think we'll do anything but ignore them and laugh at them," Rep. McCormick said about a Tennessee response.
Tennessee Rep. Gerald McCormick, a Chattanooga Republican, called the resolution "silliest thing I've ever seen any group of Republicans do."The Associated Press quotes a spokesperson for Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesen:
"I'm embarrassed that they would embarrass the party like that," he said. "They're idiots."
But trying to change the state lines now is "an absurd approach," said Will Pinkston, a senior adviser to Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesen.Tennessee State Senator Andy Berke is quoted as saying "Georgia needs to be looking at responsible solutions for how to deal with water and land-use planning, rather than irresponsible land grabs." The article notes that parts of Memphis, Tennessee's largest city, would also suddenly be in Mississippi, giving thousands of residents new addresses.
"It's unfortunate that Georgia didn't plan accordingly for growth over the past couple of decades, and now is trying to rewrite 200 years of history to address their mistakes," Pinkston said.
"Under no circumstances will Gov. Bredesen turn over Tennessee's water to Georgia," he said.
In a spirit of cooperation, however, Tennessee officials offered a couple of weeks ago to settle the matter by way of alternative dispute resolution, suggesting "a winner-take-all wrestling match or football game."
UPDATE: WPLN: Tennessee Legislature To Defend Border With Its Own Resolution
"The principle of adverse possession applies to these boundary disputes between states, not just private parties. In even starker laymans’ terms, if you fenced it, and thought it was yours, it doesn’t matter what the deed says, or what the act says, It’s yours."This might actually get interesting.
Fincher said the issue of water rights – as opposed to the boundary lines – is different in the east than it is in the water-parched west.
"Since we’re east of the Mississippi, basic water rights are the classic English water rights, the riparian water rights, and what that means is, if you live next to the stream you can use it."
UPDATE: The New York Times takes notice:
WHEREAS, Georgia lawmakers on Wednesday passed a resolution to restore the boundary line to its appropriate latitude, notwithstanding skepticism all around and outright insults from their neighbors to the north.
And WHEREAS the concept of a war between states is not foreign to these parts,
BE IT OBSERVED that the Georgia legislature appears to be serious.
Labels: drought, environment, water rights
4 Comments:
"It's unfortunate that Georgia didn't plan accordingly for growth over the past couple of decades, and now is trying to rewrite 200 years of history to address their mistakes," Pinkston said."
Indeed. I really don't see why we need to get into a border dispute just so Six Flags Over Atlanta can build a 1.2 million gallon mountain of snow on an 81 degree day.
Just because Gov. Sonny Perdue can't manage his way out of an environmental crisis doesn't mean the rest of us have to suffer.
Hate to be nitpicky about it...but Memphis is nowhere near the Georgia-Tennessee portion of the southern border of Tennessee. If the whole border were reassessed it might put some of Memphis in Mississippi.
I do believe the city in question is probably Chattanooga, currently Tennessee's fourth largest city.
Talidapali, you are correct of course. I had Georgia on my mind when I was typing that.
From the article:
"Critics also point out the proposal would have effects on the state line beyond just the Tennessee River near Chattanooga. Mississippi would also get a slice of Memphis - Tennessee's largest city - and thousands of residents could have new home states."
So both Chattanooga and Memphis would be affected.
But you know...if Georgia could be ordered to pay all the fees and taxes due for all those folks whose homes would now be in Georgia, Alabama, or Mississippi. Including having to pay for their driver's licenses and license plates to be changed over, and do all the paper work to transfer the deeds to houses and property, change the addresses, re-register voters, etc., and so forth...that might not be such a bad deal.
Plus, each person who becomes a citizen of Georgia or one of the other states should probably be given a monetary compensation (from the state of Georgia) for emotional distress upon learning they are a Bulldog, just a drop in the Crimson Tide, or a Rebel... instead of a Vol. Somethin' like that could scar a person for life!
Post a Comment
Return to Facing South's main page