Truth behind NC "voter fraud" crusade is out there -- if we can get to it
The full story behind the North Carolina voting fraud caper -- a crusade led by the N.C. State Auditor's office, in tandem with a DOJ probe, which fizzled yesterday -- remains hidden, mostly because the agencies involved have refused to release any information related to the investigation.
There are a few bits and pieces available, and they only hint at the broader story.
For example, we have documentation that appears to challenge two claims made by the N.C. State Auditor's office, led by Leslie Merritt (R).
First, Merritt has adamantly denied that their "review" of N.C. voting lists -- news of which was released minutes before a bill for same-day voter registration was to be taken up by a senate committee -- had anything to do with affecting any legislation.
Second, the auditor's office has also downplayed the involvement of Chris Mears, a state auditor employee and former N.C. GOP political director, in pushing the issue. When asked about Mears' involvement at a senate committee hearing yesterday, Merritt even said "it was all my idea."
But one of the few documents that is available about this episode is email correspondence (pdf) between Bob Hall, a voting rights advocates, and Chris Mears on June 5 and 6, 2007.
In the email, former GOP operative Mears makes statements that appear to disprove both of these claims, admitting that he -- not Merritt -- "put two-and-two together" after he "happen[ed] to notice a news account of the [same-day registration] legislation." The quote clearly suggests that Mears pushed the "voter fraud" issue because he felt his office's information was relevant to the outcome of the same-day registration bill.
Which makes sense -- why else would the auditor's office have sent a cryptic email to state senators moments before their committee was to vote on the measure?
Read the whole document here. (pdf)
There are a few bits and pieces available, and they only hint at the broader story.
For example, we have documentation that appears to challenge two claims made by the N.C. State Auditor's office, led by Leslie Merritt (R).
First, Merritt has adamantly denied that their "review" of N.C. voting lists -- news of which was released minutes before a bill for same-day voter registration was to be taken up by a senate committee -- had anything to do with affecting any legislation.
Second, the auditor's office has also downplayed the involvement of Chris Mears, a state auditor employee and former N.C. GOP political director, in pushing the issue. When asked about Mears' involvement at a senate committee hearing yesterday, Merritt even said "it was all my idea."
But one of the few documents that is available about this episode is email correspondence (pdf) between Bob Hall, a voting rights advocates, and Chris Mears on June 5 and 6, 2007.
In the email, former GOP operative Mears makes statements that appear to disprove both of these claims, admitting that he -- not Merritt -- "put two-and-two together" after he "happen[ed] to notice a news account of the [same-day registration] legislation." The quote clearly suggests that Mears pushed the "voter fraud" issue because he felt his office's information was relevant to the outcome of the same-day registration bill.
Which makes sense -- why else would the auditor's office have sent a cryptic email to state senators moments before their committee was to vote on the measure?
Read the whole document here. (pdf)
Labels: north carolina, voting rights
1 Comments:
"In the email, former GOP operative Mears makes statements that appear to disprove both of these claims, admitting that he -- not Merritt -- "put two-and-two together" after he "happen[ed] to notice a news account of the [same-day registration] legislation." The quote clearly suggests that Mears pushed the "voter fraud" issue because he felt his office's information was relevant to the outcome of the same-day registration bill."
Claiming to have "put two-and-two together" is a safe way to characterize what may well have been a completely premeditated plan to intervene, which plan may well have included the last minute, get it off the calendar tactic. What are the odds, after all, that Mears / Merritt, especially with the electoral audit in process, wouldn't have been well aware of legislation on that very subject?
It may well have been felt that the House was going to pass it anyway, but that the Senate could be thrown off its stride and be persuaded to put the bill aside to clear up any controversy and avoid any embarrassment which the undisclosed audit information might have caused. It might have worked, as well, but for the stout efforts of Bartlett, the Observer and the blogs, including this one.
It's worth considering whether the audit was initiated in January with the express purpose of using it as a tool to derail this or similar legislation. It's also worth considering whether the timing (following closely on the heels of the initiation of the Election '08 efforts by the White House, which notably included the US Attorney purge and placement of voter fraud partisans) is coincidental.
I recognize that it proves nothing, but Mears is a Regent grad with a purely political background and a proven willingness to push the envelope (the church directory business). He fits the Monica Goodling profile. It's worth further, and wider, exploration. Mears could be the key to uncovering another sector of the overall plan, using state level officials (state and county electoral officials, auditors, etc) to further 'voter fraud' efforts.
Post a Comment
Return to Facing South's main page