PO Box 531  •  Durham,NC 27702  •  Telephone: (919) 419-8311  •  Fax: (919) 419-8315

Monday, June 18, 2007

Justice in Durham?

The social disaster that began unfolding more than a year ago in Durham, N.C. after a black woman hired to strip-dance at a Duke University lacrosse team party claimed -- falsely, as it turned out -- she was gang-raped by several white men appears to be moving into the long-term recovery phase.

During state bar disciplinary proceedings Friday, Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong -- already deemed a "rogue prosecutor" by state Attorney General Roy Cooper -- tearfully announced that he was resigning his post. He later submitted a letter to North Carolina Gov. Mike Easley saying his last day on the job would be July 13, though Easley has said he wishes he could remove him sooner.

On Saturday, Nifong was stripped of his law license and banned from ever practicing again. The bar found him guilty of withholding evidence, lying to judges and making prejudicial pretrial statements.

And today, Duke University reached a private financial settlement with the three falsely accused players, whose families face millions of dollars in legal bills:
These young men and their families have been the subject of intense scrutiny that has taken a heavy toll. The Board of Trustees and the President have also determined that it is in the best interests of the Duke community to eliminate the possibility of future litigation and move forward.
The legal proceedings relating to the case are not yet over, though. Nifong as well as the Durham Police Department and other public agencies could still face civil suits, and Nifong may also be subject to criminal contempt charges.

Meanwhile, the players' attorneys have called for an independent agency to investigate what went wrong in this case. That's a good idea. But this case shouldn't be the sole concern for citizens who care about the well-being of Durham's justice system. Nifong spent most of his 30-year legal career working as a prosecutor in the Durham D.A.'s office. What was it about his experience there that allowed him to think he could get away with such egregious misconduct?

The truth eventually prevailed in this case, at least in part because the wrongly accused came from families that had the financial resources to hire excellent defense attorneys. But how many other cases prosecuted by Nifong's office have been tainted by prosecutorial misconduct that wasn't uncovered? How many other innocents have suffered because of the actions of this rogue prosecutor?

What agency will investigate this?

UPDATE: Rather than let Nifong stick around for another month, a Superior Court judge has suspended him immediately.

Labels: , , , ,

posted by Sue Sturgis at 7:05 PM | Email this post | Post a Comment
1 Comments:
Anonymous DukeAlumni80 said...

Living in Durham in the '70s and working through Duke University as an ex-athlete, knowing the attitude of the Durham Police Dept and the 'ruling families', and seeing first hand how they dealt with Duke students (and no, we were not all 'rich and priviledged--we were outsiders'--I have no doubts there are dozens, if not hundreds of illegal prosecutions in that county.

Durham is the community equivalent of a 'sick' corporation. Normally, in such a company, the CEO and all underlings would be ousted by the shareholders, and/or be out of business.

Unfortunately, in Durham, we're not discussing a 'company', but a city. Why no discussions of the Durham Police Dept Sergeant accused of a weighty number of arrests of Duke students? Guess what? This same officer and many like him in that city are just as likely to have done the same to those unable to afford to defend themselves.

I can only hope that someone picks this up, investigates not only Nifong's past prosecutions, but those of Nifong's 'mentor', and those actions of the Durham Police Dept, not just of the last year or two but of the last thirty years.

I guarantee there are all too many horror stories just waiting to be unearthed.

Last but not least, is the responsibility of the President of the University, the whole 'sick' academics who spout what used to be democratic and liberal thought from one side of their mouths, while prejudging certain classes of Duke students (and others in that community--hmmm, no wonder there are such factions in that city). As a Duke alumni, I am shamed that the Brodhead doesn't have the cajones to resign; that tho 'group of 88' are still teaching at the university. This is where I was taught? This is who educated me of the classics, of history, of science, of how to think?

Shame on you. Both Duke Administrators, Academics, the community and the city. There's an iceberg under that tip of ice, on which three Lacrosse students stand. Oh, sorry, I mean, three EX-DUKE STUDENTS.

6/19/2007 10:50 PM  

Post a Comment

Return to Facing South's main page

Southern News Update

Who Are These Folks?

CHRIS KROMM blogs three days a week for Facing South. Chris is Executive Director of the Institute for Southern Studies and publisher of the Institute’s award-winning magazine, Southern Exposure.

SUE STURGIS blogs four days a week for Facing South. Sue is the Institute’s Editorial Director and a former reporter for The Independent Weekly and The Raleigh News & Observer.

DESIREE EVANS blogs four days a week for Facing South. Desiree is a Research Associate at the Institute and former policy analyst for TransAfrica.

The views expressed on Facing South are those of the authors and not necessarily represent the views of the Institute for Southern Studies. The editors reserve the right to reject comments that are abusive, offensive, misleading, or that promote commercial goods and services.

Previous Posts