PO Box 531  •  Durham,NC 27702  •  Telephone: (919) 419-8311  •  Fax: (919) 419-8315

Monday, December 18, 2006

EPA sued over air pollution standards

A coalition of public health and environmental groups filed suit last week against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for failing to toughen the national standard for particulate matter pollution to a level that could prevent thousands of premature deaths every year.

Earthjustice, a nonprofit public-interest law firm, filed the suit on behalf of the American Lung Association, Environmental Defense and the National Parks Conservation Association. It's a response to the EPA's October decision to reject the advice of its own scientific advisory panel and staff scientists, who called for strengthening the existing standard of 15 micrograms per cubic meter for fine particulate matter to a more protective standard between 13 and 14 micrograms per cubic meter.

The current standard was set in 1997. The Clean Air Act requires the EPA to review air quality standards every five years and revise them based on the latest scientific information.

Scientists estimate that particulate pollution is responsible for tens of thousands of premature deaths nationwide every year by aggravating respiratory illnesses such as asthma, bronchitis, emphysema, and pneumonia. The pollution is also linked to premature deaths from other causes, such as lung cancer and heart disease.

Over 20 million people across the South live in areas where the air fails to meet federal health standards, according to the Southern Environmental Law Center. Particulate pollution also takes a heavy toll on the region's economy, SELC notes:
The Great Smoky Mountains National Park and the Shenandoah National Park continue to be ranked as the two most polluted parks in the country due to air pollution, leading to decreased visibility from the Park's ridges. The result is a heavy financial burden -- as much as $320 million annually in lost sales and tax benefits, and over 4,000 jobs -- for the mountain communities depending on tourism revenue from these parks.
"Anyone who questions the need to lower particulate matter pollution standards should take a hike in Great Smoky Mountains or Sequoia national parks in August," says Mark Wenzler, director of NPCA's Clean Air Program. "You will likely encounter a haze so thick you can barely see the next ridge. Imagine what that pollution is doing to your lungs."
posted by Sue Sturgis at 2:50 PM | Email this post | Post a Comment
2 Comments:
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Good article. We now know that this soot or haze causes cancer, heart disease (just like smoking cig's) and even increases the incidence of suicides and heart attacks when levels of soot (pm2.5) increase.

WWW.BlueSkiesNow.blogspot.com does a good job at showing folks how to identify this stuff on an average day with good links to other organizations working on air quality and visibility reductions efforts.

12/19/2006 7:52 AM  
Anonymous Duncan St. Clair said...

I agree. It's about time someone starting saying something, esp. since the EPA/NPS are doing nothing about pollution. I'm an ex-Ranger and started a website - www.savethesmokies.org - that covers Park pollution.

12/19/2006 6:18 PM  

Post a Comment

Return to Facing South's main page

Southern News Update

Who Are These Folks?

CHRIS KROMM blogs three days a week for Facing South. Chris is Executive Director of the Institute for Southern Studies and publisher of the Institute’s award-winning magazine, Southern Exposure.

SUE STURGIS blogs four days a week for Facing South. Sue is the Institute’s Editorial Director and a former reporter for The Independent Weekly and The Raleigh News & Observer.

DESIREE EVANS blogs four days a week for Facing South. Desiree is a Research Associate at the Institute and former policy analyst for TransAfrica.

The views expressed on Facing South are those of the authors and not necessarily represent the views of the Institute for Southern Studies. The editors reserve the right to reject comments that are abusive, offensive, misleading, or that promote commercial goods and services.

Previous Posts