PO Box 531  •  Durham,NC 27702  •  Telephone: (919) 419-8311  •  Fax: (919) 419-8315

Thursday, November 17, 2005

Thinking ahead: a question...

Posted by R. Neal

Apropos of the previous post, and not to stray too far off into the land of political wonkery, but I think we should eliminate state presidential primaries and let the parties nominate their candidate at their respective conventions. Or, at least have all the state primaries on the same day. What do you think?
posted by R. Neal at 7:37 AM | Email this post | Post a Comment
4 Comments:
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I concur. The primaries incorporate partisan politics as a function of government. Essentially, the .gov endorses a party system. I think that's a no-no.

-SayUncle

11/17/2005 11:57 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Good idea. I would like a single primary where you could vote for anyone running, Democrat, Republican, etc. Then a run-off of the top vote getters without regard to their political party. You could potentially have more than one candidate from the same party. If parties want to have party exclusive elections (primaries as they are in most states), let them pay for it, not the taxpayers some of whom wouldn't be allowed to vote in that party exclusive primary.

11/17/2005 4:06 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

until the US is no longer suffering under a two-party exclusive-access lockout, then we need primaries, if for nothing more than allowing the people more opportunity to weigh in on the roster of candidates. if you allow the Convention (regardless of which one) to pick, you will be almost guaranteed of getting a partisan hack.

having all primaries on the same day would be confusing at first, but a good transitional step. however, the best possible election reform package would probably be Instant Runoff Voting in the main election, with easy ballot access for all third parties, and strict campaign finance limitations.

11/18/2005 9:36 AM  
Blogger Ruby said...

I completely agree, the primary parade across the states add nothing of substance to the presidential selection process. But even more helpful would be to abolish the electoral college.

11/19/2005 10:26 AM  

Post a Comment

Return to Facing South's main page

Southern News Update

Who Are These Folks?

CHRIS KROMM blogs three days a week for Facing South. Chris is Executive Director of the Institute for Southern Studies and publisher of the Institute’s award-winning magazine, Southern Exposure.

SUE STURGIS blogs four days a week for Facing South. Sue is the Institute’s Editorial Director and a former reporter for The Independent Weekly and The Raleigh News & Observer.

DESIREE EVANS blogs four days a week for Facing South. Desiree is a Research Associate at the Institute and former policy analyst for TransAfrica.

The views expressed on Facing South are those of the authors and not necessarily represent the views of the Institute for Southern Studies. The editors reserve the right to reject comments that are abusive, offensive, misleading, or that promote commercial goods and services.

Previous Posts