PO Box 531  •  Durham,NC 27702  •  Telephone: (919) 419-8311  •  Fax: (919) 419-8315

Tuesday, October 04, 2005

Army Lowers Standards to Ease Recruitment Crisis

When faced with defeat, move the goalposts:
Facing recruiting shortages brought on by the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Army has decided to accept a greater number of recruits who score near the bottom of military aptitude tests, the secretary of the Army said Monday.

Coming off a recruiting year in which the Army fell short of its goal of 80,000 active-duty soldiers, Army Secretary Francis J. Harvey announced that the Army would allow up to 4% of its recruiting class to be Category IV recruits — those who scored between the 16th and 30th percentile in the battery of aptitude tests that the Defense Department gives to all potential military personnel.
Maybe this desperation is why they're harassing and jailing veterans who peacefully protest campus recruitment drives.

UPDATE: See also this story about military recruiters helping teens fake high school diplomas.
posted by Chris Kromm at 7:45 AM | Email this post | Post a Comment
3 Comments:
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I believe (OK, actually know) that diploma forging was going on even before the services were having trouble making quotas.

In the case that I'm aware of, it was more for the poor soul's good than trying to meet a quota. It was pretty much the only way for him to get out of an abusive relationship. Talk about being led around by the gonads.

On the other hand, this person is thriving now and doing incredibly well for himself and the service now.

10/04/2005 12:36 PM  
Blogger Synova said...

Used to be the Army was an option for young people facing a jail term. Used to be the Army taught remedial reading at basic training. High School drop outs could always join the Army... then.

Not now. Standards went up because recruiting goals could be met taking the higher scoring applicants, the ones with diplomas and without even misdemeanor and juvenile convictions. It's even harder to get into the Air Force or Navy, not that the AF or Navy is *harder* but because there are more applicants and the ASVAB score limit can be set higher.

In some cases the disqualifications for military service have nothing to do with the ability of the people to do the job. Air Force pilots have more applicants than slots so some issues, such as eyesight, are used to reduce applicant numbers.

If the Army is taking people with lower scores it is because they believe enough of those people have the ability to do the job that it's worth the hassle of the ones who will wash-out of training. If they start to take people with non-violent juvenile records or other issues it will be for the same reasons. These people used to be directed to the Army as a good way to straighten out their lives and for a great many of them it worked.

Will they put a gun in the hand of an unqualified dullard? People *in* the military have a better sense of self-preservation than that.

This crowing about desperation is unseemly, and I'm tempted to say typical.

http://madeucegunners.blogspot.com/2005/10/record.html

10/05/2005 1:01 AM  
Blogger Synova said...

http://www.madison.com/post/blogs/militarymatters/index.php?ntid=56658&ntpid=2

Just in case anyone actually cares.

10/06/2005 12:19 AM  

Post a Comment

Return to Facing South's main page

Southern News Update

Who Are These Folks?

CHRIS KROMM blogs three days a week for Facing South. Chris is Executive Director of the Institute for Southern Studies and publisher of the Institute’s award-winning magazine, Southern Exposure.

SUE STURGIS blogs four days a week for Facing South. Sue is the Institute’s Editorial Director and a former reporter for The Independent Weekly and The Raleigh News & Observer.

DESIREE EVANS blogs four days a week for Facing South. Desiree is a Research Associate at the Institute and former policy analyst for TransAfrica.

The views expressed on Facing South are those of the authors and not necessarily represent the views of the Institute for Southern Studies. The editors reserve the right to reject comments that are abusive, offensive, misleading, or that promote commercial goods and services.

Previous Posts