Lynching Apologetics: Not Just in Dixie Anymore
It's been at least a few hours since Gary or I blogged about the Senate lynching resolution scandal, so I feel moved to weigh in with one more thought, this one about the regional character of the Lackadaisical About Lynching Caucus.
Today's much-discussed Roll Call story -- which showed the story still had legs -- noted that Democrats are painting the failure of conservative Senators to take a stance against lynching as part of a Republican "Southern Strategy" to appeal to racist whites. But the reality may be more troubling.
To review, here are the names of the recalcitrant 13 Senators who remain unapologetic for their failure to co-sponsor the anti-lynching resolution:
Yet of the 21 Senators who have either refused to apologize for the practice, or who came galloping to the cause only after the media firestorm had erupted, fully 14 -- two out of three -- came from outside of the South. Over half of the 13 Senators who hold out to this very day are non-Southerners.
Not to let the seven Southern Senators off the hook. But clearly they have no monopoly on racial insensitivity and bad judgement, and its equally clear the Lackadaisical Caucus' silence was more than a move to appease a few racist whites in Dixie. What should worry people is that the whatever political dynamic is at work, it's gone national, and progressives don't do anyone any favors by failing to acknowledge this goes way beyond the South.
Today's much-discussed Roll Call story -- which showed the story still had legs -- noted that Democrats are painting the failure of conservative Senators to take a stance against lynching as part of a Republican "Southern Strategy" to appeal to racist whites. But the reality may be more troubling.
To review, here are the names of the recalcitrant 13 Senators who remain unapologetic for their failure to co-sponsor the anti-lynching resolution:
Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.); Robert Bennett (R-Utah); Michael Enzi and Craig Thomas (R-Wyo.); Judd Gregg and John Sununu (R- N.H.); Richard Shelby (R-Ala.); Jon Kyl (R-Arizona); Gordon Smith (R-Ore.); John Cornyn and Kay Bailey Hutchinson (R-Texas); and Thad Cochran and Trent Lott (R-Miss.).Notice something interesting about that list? It might be clearer if we add the names of the eight Senators who, even though the resolution had been circulating for months, were so unmoved by the cause that they waited until after it passed to sign on:
Kent Conrad (D-N.D.); Jack Reed (D-RI); Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.); George V. Voinovich (R-Ohio); Lisa Murkowski (R-Ark.); Mike Crapo (R-Idaho); Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa); and Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) (note the three Democrats; this wasn't just a partisan issue).Lynching was largely a Southern phenomenon; of the over 4,700 documented lynchings that took place between 1882 and 1968, 80% happened in 13 Southern states. Almost half occurred in Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas alone.
Yet of the 21 Senators who have either refused to apologize for the practice, or who came galloping to the cause only after the media firestorm had erupted, fully 14 -- two out of three -- came from outside of the South. Over half of the 13 Senators who hold out to this very day are non-Southerners.
Not to let the seven Southern Senators off the hook. But clearly they have no monopoly on racial insensitivity and bad judgement, and its equally clear the Lackadaisical Caucus' silence was more than a move to appease a few racist whites in Dixie. What should worry people is that the whatever political dynamic is at work, it's gone national, and progressives don't do anyone any favors by failing to acknowledge this goes way beyond the South.
1 Comments:
According to Senator Landrieu's website, Senator Hutchinson has come out in some sort of support. I sent the following to Senator Cornyn:
Senator Cornyn:
As your topic list does not include Senate Resolution 39 as "hot" (an omission, in my view), I felt that "Crime" at least approaches the nature of lynchings.
In particular, your absence of overt support for this resolution (apologizing to the victims of lynching and the descendants of those victims
for the failure of the Senate to enact anti-lynching legislation) is, at best, baffling.
I find your inaction profoundly disturbing, particularly in light of your career in the judicial system.
While your colleague was not a sponsor, Senator Hutchinson was apparently able to at least register her support with Senator Landrieu.
Finally, I fail to see how your inaction fulfills your role as "a voice for Texas values in Washington."
Sir, you disappoint me.
Respectfully,
Kerry McCollough
San Antonio, Texas
Post a Comment
Return to Facing South's main page